Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ARFISA Representaciones, SCP
Files uploaded by ARFISA Representaciones, SCP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Din 931 Dacromet.jpg
- File:Din 931 Bicromatado.jpg
- File:Din 931 10.9.jpg
- File:Din 931 12.9.jpg
- File:Din 931 6.8.jpg
- File:Din 931 Inoxidable.jpg
- File:Din 931 8.8.JPG
- File:Din 917.jpg
- File:Din 928.jpg
- File:Din 929.jpg
- File:Din 916 Inoxidable.jpg
- File:Din 916.jpg
- File:Din 915.jpg
- File:Din 913.jpg
- File:Din 914.jpg
- File:Din 912.jpg
- File:Din 912 Inoxidable.jpg
- File:Din 910.jpg
- File:Din 908.jpg
- File:Din 906.jpg
- File:Din 610.jpg
- File:Din 608 (Plow Bolt).jpg
- File:Din 609.jpg
- File:Din 605.jpg
- File:Din 604.jpg
- File:Din 603 6.8.jpg
- File:Din 603 8.8.jpg
- File:Din 571.jpg
- File:Din 582.jpg
- File:Din 580.jpg
- File:Din 564.jpg
- File:Din 557.jpg
- File:Din 561.jpg
- File:Din 551.jpg
- File:Din 553.jpg
- File:Din 472.jpg
- File:Din 471.jpg
- File:Din 463.jpg
- File:Din 444.jpg
- File:Din 436.jpg
- File:Din 438.jpg
- File:Din 435.jpg
- File:Din 433.jpg
- File:Din 434.jpg
- File:Din 432.jpg
- File:Din 427.jpg
- File:Din 417.jpg
- File:ARFISA 43.jpg
- File:ARFISA 41.jpg
- File:ARFISA 42.jpg
- File:ARFISA 39.jpg
- File:ARFISA 38.jpg
- File:ARFISA 40.jpg
- File:ARFISA 35.jpg
- File:ARFISA 36.jpg
- File:ARFISA 37.jpg
- File:ARFISA 33.jpg
- File:ARFISA 32.jpg
- File:ARFISA 34.jpg
- File:ARFISA 29.jpg
- File:ARFISA 31.jpg
- File:ARFISA 30.jpg
- File:ARFISA 26.jpg
- File:ARFISA 28.jpg
- File:ARFISA 27.jpg
- File:ARFISA 23.jpg
- File:ARFISA 25.jpg
- File:ARFISA 24.jpg
- File:ARFISA 22.jpg
- File:ARFISA 20.jpg
- File:ARFISA 21.jpg
- File:ARFISA 19.jpg
- File:ARFISA 18.jpg
- File:ARFISA 17.jpg
- File:ARFISA 15.jpg
- File:ARFISA 13.jpg
- File:ARFISA 14.jpg
- File:ARFISA 10.jpg
- File:ARFISA 12.jpg
- File:ARFISA 11.jpg
- File:ARFISA 09.jpg
- File:ARFISA 08.jpg
- File:ARFISA 07.jpg
- File:ARFISA 05.jpg
- File:ARFISA 06.jpg
- File:ARFISA 04.jpg
- File:ARFISA 01.jpg
- File:ARFISA 03.jpg
- File:ARFISA 02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep all. What does "Collection of advertisement" mean? Who or what are they advertising? As images of specific types of nut and bolt are encyclopaedically useful, these meet our criteria as being of educational scope. Many are already in use and are often the only image we have of a specific fastener.
"No evidence of permission(s)" There is a licence tag added during upload by the uploader. There is no credible reason to discount this.
If we look at the uploader's talk page User talk:ARFISA Representaciones, SCP, we see the real reason for the multiple attacks on them, whether it's for "very low quality images", using non-English language, "advertising", "out of scope images" (many of these images are already in use at WP and engineering-interested editors were very grateful to have them too). Also the bulk tagging of images as "uncategorized" (they were categorized, just not in English) with of course zero effort made to categorize them is also unhelpful.
These images are of course bad because the editor uploading them is bad: commercial editors are simply unwelcome on Wikimedia projects – even when they are offering valuable content for free and are (or once were!) happy to freely license this. There is no more reason than that to this fatuous bulk deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep: There’s no reason to doubt the licensing wholesale — or, if there is, then nominator should share it. As for «collection of advertisement», it is meaningless. Maybe some of these images should be deleted on various grounds — lack of quality in items for which we have a lot of superior media, for one — but a blanket deletion request such as this should not be accepted. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Some of the file descriptions include irrelevant spammy text. I’ll try to remove that. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Done. -- Tuválkin ✉ 10:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep It may be useful to advise the uploader on how a credit template could be used on their images, particularly if an OTRS reference might help stop future deletion requests. --Fæ (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 08:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)