Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EEIM

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It's arguable that all of these files are under the threshold of originality

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This is a very broad nomination. It would be better if these were split up by country or something. I don't have time to comment on each right now, but some obvious ones:--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: some logos like this was upload beacuse on english wikipedia says :and I quote: This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Any user may perform this move—please see Moving images to the Commons for more information please won't put this information again ,so you make me waste my time.--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this got over the discussion.

most of logos are too simple example--EEIM (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This first statement is more of a caution to EEIM and other persons who transfer files from other projects to here; there are many times images are marked for transfer but may not actually be able to be moved. So the responsibility is yours to decide if a move is good or not. Anyways, I agree with the deletion of File:Casi discovery military.JPG because it is very low quality version (like an Inkscape trace) and it is unused. I am going to look at the other files and write down my thoughts on them. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alot of these are too simple, they should have been done in groups or individually, not all together. File:The DirecTV logo.png is definitely a  Keep Fry1989 eh? 03:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment: I don't agree upload images with just words,a lot of companies have logos without (take out) image,for exemple Qatar foundation is a sponsor F.C. Barcelona and on t shirt says qatar fountation non-tree.

I don't agree with fair use ,it's an illegal way to be legal, but it will do on englishwiki,because wikipedia from usa and americans (from usa) have paid this project,at least the most or half.

For us (wikipedia commons) free images,thereby ,i delete copyright and left image free, see even at airports ,tv,magazines,etc,we see that logos,and everybody know them

Kept: Some of these should be deleted, but a mass DR that crosses countries is beyond our ability to handle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sourced to Flickr which doesn't tell where the images come from. There is no evidence that the photographers are anonymous and there is no information about the age of the images at all.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


these files,is long time,copyright has expired. author is unknown.--EEIM (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright holder most likely they are dead.is too difficult say the source. is pd old,at Flickr anyone upload files,in this case copyright has expired,and they uploaded,i cant say is mine,and i put as source Flickr.--EEIM (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please read:and notice last point --EEIM (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC) {{PD-Colombia}}[reply]

These images are free in its home country, Colombia.--EEIM (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can you tell that the photos are old enough, when the source doesn't even say how old they are? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer:reading --EEIM (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1900_1930/cucuta_1900_1930.htm[reply]

The page [1] is useless for determining the copyright status of the images since the page appears to contain images from various sources without telling where the images come from. You need to check that website's sources too. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you're right but just in one delete this took in 1952.--EEIM (talk) 06:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons -FASTILY 11:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering recently "enlarged" User talk:EEIM (Panoramio/etc. grabber). File:Valle de Cúcuta.jpg with exif: Canon PowerShot A640 --> mysteriously only 1 time used in his X k uploads.

Gunnex (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely not own work, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos above COM:TOO. For Discovery Channel cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:DiscoveryChannel logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Discovery-Channel-logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casi discovery hd.JPG and so on.

Sealle (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. Is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia

File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. Image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia.

File:AZ Corazón logo.svg and others are image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is a simple logo of official logo . this has copyright.

File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg simple logo with map. map have copyright?.

File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg looks like OK, but Im not sure. --EEIM (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg which is in the public domain since it is a public entity in Colombia. No copyright is infringed in any way and the logo can be uploaded on Commons with no probs. Keep also for File:AZ Corazón logo.svg which its vector variant was made from scratch and it is not eligible for copyright. The same applies for File:AZ Tv De Paga logo.svg and File:AZ Click! logo.svg which were also made from scratch and can't be copyrighteable. For File:Discovery Channel en Español logo.svg, I give it a keep since the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborate enough to be claimed as WP:TOO, and thus it stays. It is also the case for File:Inter-american Development Bank logo.svg. However, for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg, the world icon is a bit complex for a simple image, but I would still give it a pass. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg itself is a public insignia, not eligible for copyright regardless of how complex it is, according to Colombian laws. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is not complex enough to be labelled as WP:TOO, so it passes anyway. For File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg, the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg consists on simple geometric lines, not compatible with the threshold for originality, so the image stays. --Bankster (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg because it is a public entity in Colombia. The logo doesn't infringe a copyright infringement and can be uploaded in commons. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. File:AZ Corazón logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple image and text. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborated enough to be claimed as WP: TOO, and thus it stays, the same goes for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg. Finally, File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, and doesn't have copyrights. Futbolero44 (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete for File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg. Should be a speedy deletion actually, since it is a recreation of deleted content. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:FARC party logo.png for the most recent nomination and links to past uploads before that. Bankster's comment above about this logo being "in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either". This is not true. There is no copyright exemption in the US or Colombia for "political party insignia", nor any suggestion that political parties cannot be holders of intellectual property/copyrights. In fact, the party that created this logo releases all of their material under a CC no-derivatives license. seb26 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_EEIM&oldid=294646660"