Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Xanderliptak
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Xanderliptak
[edit]
- Xanderliptak (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Alexander Liptak (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- JDF6574 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale
[edit]- Reason: Alexander Liptak (talk · contribs) and is banned from Commons. Today SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) reported that per a check at enwiki JDF6574 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) is a probable sock account. As such, if so, that'd be a ban evasion as per Commons:BLOCK#Use§8. As I myself do not have enough background to make a decision nor dealed with the issue in the past I am reporting it here for your consideration. Regards. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 10:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: live discussion taking place over Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Xanderliptak_rides_again. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 20:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Results
[edit]- Thanks. Since both User:Alexander Liptak and User:Xanderliptak were banned here more than a year ago, I have nothing to check against. For the record, the WP:EN note cited above concluded that User:JDF6574 and User:Pratt232 are the same user and that both are likely socks of Liptak. Pratt232 is not registered here. JDF6574 has made 4 apparently innocuous edits. I will keep an eye on them. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- I knew that one could be a bit problematic since the accounts are stale from a CU perspective. I have suggested at the admin board that log data (if any) could help the investigation. Perhaps Tiptoety (which is a CU over enwiki and here) could crosscheck and compare data. Discussion is taking place over here. Regards. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 20:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- There really isn't much more that I can do from en.wiki. That said, given Alison's CU findings I have blocked JDF6574. Tiptoety talk 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.