User:A.Savin/Archive/2017/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Der Benutzer hat im Support um Revision seiner Sache gebeten. So sehr ich deine Sicht der Dinge verstehe, so wenig sinnvoll finde ich, dass du da in eigener Sache tätig wirst. Richter und Polizist sollten immer zwei verschiedene Personen sein. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Reinhard Kraasch: Spurzem hat verschiedene Benutzer persönlich angegriffen, und das schon über längere Zeit, ohne jede Einsicht und Selbstreflexion. Dass er bisher nicht gesperrt worden war, liegt allein daran, dass von den aktiven Admins nur die allerwenigsten überhaupt Interesse an Vorgängen in QIC haben, wie ich aus langjähriger Erfahrung weiß. Von einer Sperrung in eigener Sache kann keine Rede sein, hingegen ist eine eigenmächtige Entsperrung auf (E-Mail-)Zuruf, ohne mich vorher zu konsultieren und sogar unter Angabe eines falschen Entsperrgrundes (es gibt seitens Spurzem offensichtlich keinerlei Absicht, die Sperre anzufechten, zumal er sich bewusst sein wird, dass er da im Lichte seines Verhaltens vor und nach der Sperre ausgesprochen schlechte Karten hat), glasklarer Missbrauch der Adminrechte. So etwas mag auf deutscher Wikipedia gängige Praxis sein, aber Commons ist nunmal (zum Glück) nicht die deutsche Wikipedia. --A.Savin 12:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Ich habe mich bislang noch nicht um die Commons-Prozeduren zu Benutzersperren gekümmert (hatte ehrlich gesagt Besseres zu tun), das war wohl ein Fehler. In der deutschen Wikipedia ist die übliche Prozedur, den Benutzer (ausschließlich für die Sperrprüfung) zu entsperren. Ich bitte um Entschuldigung, wenn das wie Overruling aussah, das war nicht meine Absicht. In der Sache bleibe ich aber dabei: Als Betroffener die Benutzersperre selbst vorzunehmen, ist mindestens unglücklich.
Aber wie auch immer: Ich habe jetzt den Benutzer im Support auf die korrekte Vorgehensweise hingewiesen. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle Trade Rows Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful composition, so that when I saw the thumbnail, I was thinking of this as a possible FP, but surprisingly, it's not so sharp at full size. Could you improve the sharpness a bit? -- Ikan Kekek 03:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment My opinion is: a) the picture is sharp enough for QI, not softer than many promoted images. b) QI and FP shall have same quality standards, so if a picture is eligible for QI, so it is eligible for FP provided sufficient support. c) Still, I don't think it's wow enough for FP, look at the construction fence for example (this is also only my personal opinion). --A.Savin 16:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying I thought of it as a possible FP until I looked at it at full size. I don't agree that FP and QI have the same image quality standards all the time, though, because on rare occasions, "wow" overrides quality concerns at FPC, but generally not at QIC. That said, I could be wrong, but I feel like you have opposed images with softness similar to this, so I won't be the one to promote this one unless you sharpen it a bit. -- Ikan Kekek 17:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done I may occasionally make mistakes as every human does, but in general I don't decline pictures with similar level of sharpness, unless there are other serious issues. --A.Savin 18:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Either way, you palpably improved the picture. -- Ikan Kekek 20:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatinsky Zaton YakornayaStreet with bus 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatinsky Zaton ZatonnayaStreet 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Colours are very strong, maybe too strong. However quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img01 Gedenkstaette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img02 Emma Ihrer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img04 Robert Wengels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blindenhilfswerk B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baptistenkirche B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal Handwerkervereinshaus Berlin Jan2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Berlin-Wannsee Empfangsgebaeude 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For my taste, I would prefer less branches in the foreground. However, still acceptable, good quality. --Basotxerri 20:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

FoP

Hallo! Ähm. Das mit FoP bei File:Dülmen, Haselbrink -- 2017 -- 9419.jpg war kein Scherz. Eher Vergesslichkeit. Sorry. Ich hatte die nachträgliche Korrektur vergessen. Ich prüfe auch meine anderen Uploads von gestern. Da müssen noch welche sein. Danke auf jeden Fall für deine Korrektur. --XRay talk 06:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

OK danke. --A.Savin 06:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img03 Paul Singer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img05 Luise Zietz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img1 Haus Rautenstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think that the image is OK but that central sign really bothers me. Have you thought about a better crop without it? --Basotxerri 15:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment It would be really way too tight crop. To clone out is possible, but the grey sign on grey ground doesn't bother me. But perhaps I better should have used my Sigma8-16 indeed --A.Savin 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img2 Schloss Doberlug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img4 Schloss Doberlug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img5 Klosterkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img7 Klosterkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Schloss Sacrow 05-15 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Sobre imagen en Consesual Review

Hola --A.Savin , un saludo, le hago unas letras por el tema de la imagen File:Tractor_arando_la_tierra_para_cultivo.jpg que recientemente he subido y que ahora está en la zona Consensual review, con opiniones del usuario --Spurzem y de usted. En uno de sus comentarios usted dice que no entendía sobre porqué yo no le había solicitado ayuda, y que tal vez fuese poco interés mío, por favor, no es así, y trataré de explicarle; ante todo le pido disculpas nuevamente si el subir esas fotos de tractores no haya sido correcto, solo lo hice porque consideré que podían ser buenas imágenes, y que podrían ser validas para la comunidad, pero disculpe si no ha sido así. Como usted conoce desde mi error cometido en marzo del año 2014, he continuado tratando de ser siempre muy cuidadoso en mis colaboraciones, para en todo momento buscar hacer todo bien y mejorar en las contribuciones que haga. Como podrán ver no soy un usuario que suba muchas imágenes, ni lo hago constantemente, trato de seleccionar bien aquellas que propongo, y siempre buscando como mi único interés llegar a ser un buen colaborador de la comunidad de Commons, pero en el caso de esas imágenes de los tractores en cuestión, desgraciadamente no poseo mucha más información que pudiera agregar, son unas fotos que tomé al azar en un viaje que hacía por el campo, y pensando que pudieran ser buenas imágenes, las coloqué para valoración por parte de la comunidad, pero no soy conocedor de esa materia, y por eso no comprendo bien que podía faltar según usted nos explica para poder agregarlo, y fue esa la razón por la que me mantenía callado y no me atrevía a comentar nada sobre lo que ustedes hablaban, era solo eso. Si usted considera que las imágenes no califican para ser QI, yo lo comprendería perfectamente, y trataría de continuar mejorando mucho más para las próximas. Quedo a la espera de su nuevo comentario y decisión, le ruego perdone le escriba en mi idioma, y le reitero mis disculpas. Un saludo Ivan2010

Ivan2010 As I stated on QI, the image has enough quality, the only problem are messy categories. I can do the fix for you, but please let me know where were the photos of the tractor taken. I suppose it was in Cuba, but would not add the category unless you as photographer confirm that. --A.Savin 23:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Hola --A.Savin, gracias por su respuesta y explicación, es correcto lo que me comenta, la foto la tomé acá en Cuba, concretamente; en un campo de la provincia de Artemisa, situada al oeste de la Habana, pero no poseo más detalles sobre los demás elementos que muestra la imagen, no conozco el tipo de implemento usado, ni sobre el modelo del tractor, a eso me refería sobre no tener más información. Ya usted me dirá si le puede servir de algo esos pocos datos. Una vez más le reitero las gracias, y continuaré mejorando mis contribuciones. Un saludo y mis mejores deseos para usted desde acá. Ivan2010 23:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img07 Chinese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img09 Merkur Bergstation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img26 Kurpark cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img44 view of Gaggenau from Ebersteinburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img52 Friedrichsbad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochmeister-Kirche Berlin-Halensee 07-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Baerensteinstr08-2015 abandoned retail building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img01 Korean Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn 08-2015 Alt-Marzahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn 08-2015 windmill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Bergheider See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Foerderbruecke F60 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Foerderbruecke F60 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Klinkerwerk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Teichland-Express.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The "skyscrapers" are leaning ccw.--Ermell 07:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC) ✓ Fixed. --A.Savin 23:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)  Support --Milseburg 22:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img15 Bearded vulture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img17 Indian lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img20 Indian lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img22 Siberian tiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img27 Hungarian Grey cattle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Leninprosp-mm.jpg и категории

Приветствую! Вы убрали из указанного файла две из четырех добавленных мной категорий. Поясните, пожалуйста, свое действие, чтобы я смог скорректировать свои. --Michgrig (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Ну, центрированной композицию там вряд ли назовёшь, а лавочка еле видна. --A.Savin 11:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
ОК, согласен, спасибо. P.S. Подскажите еще, пожалуйста, почему на этой странице у многих ваших корреспондентов (включая меня) в подписи висит красная ссылка int:Talkpagelinktext? Я так понимаю, что это появляется при дефолтной разметке подписи в настройках. Например, на странице User talk:Xenotron#File:Moscow Metro Ez 5424 Bagrationovskaya station 20051104 178 (10481199883).jpg или на моей СО User talk:Michgrig#Станции метро такого эффекта нет. --Michgrig (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Было перегружено шаблонами, теперь, после архивации, всё вроде окей. --A.Savin 15:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Ясно. --Michgrig (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img07 View from Schlosswall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img14 Herring gull at the bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cute and high-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img15 view to Jürgensby.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rafesmar 20:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westhafen Berlin Aussicht von Beusselstr 04-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westhafen Berlin Aussicht von Beusselstr 04-2015 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img4 Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Bf Calau 07-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uebigau EE 09-2015 Schloss Uebigau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BfMuencheberg Zug der Buckower Kleinbahn 08-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Can you help me please

Hei someone has upload my father picture on common can you please delete this picture because my father is deied, and this picture is a personal picture help me please someone take the picture from my facebook and this is the picture that i want you to deleted. File:Abdulsatar Baloch.jpg Bukti.khan (talk) 08:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img06 Fritz Zubeil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img07 Johannes Stelling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img08 Adolph Hoffmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img09 Adolf Braun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img10 Hermann Weyl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img1 Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img2 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img3 Dorfkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Matches the guide lines but looks unrealistic --Ermell 15:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img5 Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woltersdorf Soviet monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igor Rudenskiy Jan2015 RT Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Susanne Holst Berlin 2015-08-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marat Gatsalov TASS Moscow 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igor Butman IF Moscow 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin S-Bahn Botanischer Garten 04-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Kladow Gutspark Neukladow 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View Berlin TV Tower Jan2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Quite nice apart from the distortion on the left and the tight bottom crop; have you got a version with a wider crop?--Peulle 12:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC) ✓ New version. Unfortunately, I don't have more space at bottom. Note also that for this kind of view, it is not possible to avoid some distortions. Nonetheless I think the new version should be an improvement --A.Savin 15:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Support Yes, it's a bit better, crisper. I take it we don't do perspective adjustments on top-down shots.--Peulle 00:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grunewald-Kirche Bismarckallee 10-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Peulle 12:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Schloss Sacrow 05-15 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam view from Nikolaikirche 05-15 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img02 Korean Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 15:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img04 Japanese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img06 Christian Monastery Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img09 Chinese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img10 Chinese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img11 Hermann Mueller-Franken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img12 Hugo Haase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img13 Alwin Koersten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img14 Wilhelm Liebknecht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img15 Richard Fischer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fichtenberg-Schule B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigsallee Berlin-Grunewald 10-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm Prenzlauer Berg Berlin 07-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherkirche B-Schoeneberg 07-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Charlottenburg Berlin Otto-Suhr-Allee 07-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img1 Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img3 Peter-Paul-Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img6 Stadtfestung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img7 Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

I know Kung fu!


THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
I hereby award you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures.
--The RedBurn (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kyrenia 01-2017 img04 view from castle bastion.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyrenia 01-2017 img04 view from castle bastion.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img16 Eugen Brueckner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img17 Wilhelm Pfannkuch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img18 Hermann Molkenbuhr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img19 Friedrich Bartels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img20 Waldeck Manasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img03 View from Merkur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img28 Zhukovsky bust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img43 view from Ebersteinburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img57 Lichtental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img2 Amtsgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img07 Barbary macaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img08 Rothschild giraffe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img11 African elephant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img19 Indian lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Not sure about the left crop, but, IMHO, overall, good quality. --C messier 09:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img25 Siberian tiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenkranz-Basilika B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA und Gedenkstaette Ploetzensee 04-2015 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img8 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img9 Ruine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valeriy Fokin TASS Moscow 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiko Maas Berlin 2015-08-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irina Slutskaya IF Moscow 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolay A Roschin TASS Moscow 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img21 Theodor Leipart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img22 Kaethe Kollwitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img23 Otto Nagel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img24 Jenny Mucchi Wiegmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img27 Hermann Maechtig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Episkopi 01-2017 img06 Kourion.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Episkopi 01-2017 img06 Kourion.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img3 Pfarrkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img5 Soldatenfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woltersdorf view from Kranichsberg tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img2 Jagdschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img6 Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 Schloss img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Foerderbruecke F60 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichterfeld EE 09-2015 Foerderbruecke F60 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img28 Axel Fintelmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img29 Simon Blad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img30 Feierhalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img33 Konrad Wolf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 Schloss img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. Right side is leaning inward little bit. --Halavar 10:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment I've looked at it, perspective appears OK to me. --A.Savin 13:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
This is a really strange building... You're right, edges are much more important. Can pass as QI --Halavar 13:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img11 Bahnhof Merkurwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img22 View from Kurpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img51 Market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img56 Lichtental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 13:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img16 Bearded vulture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img24 Siberian tiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img3 Schloss Doberlug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doberlug-Kirchhain May2015 img6 Klosterkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img03 Korean Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 17:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img05 Japanese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 17:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img08 Chinese Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img11 park alley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img13 Oriental Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img21 Indian lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good enough even for a zoo view, but please identify this cat as a lioness. Lions have manes, lionesses like this one do not. -- Ikan Kekek 12:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)  Question Thre is addition "female" in description, isn't it enough? --A.Savin 22:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hmmm...I guess I somehow glossed over that. I won't quibble about such a minor distinction. -- Ikan Kekek 05:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Kladow Gutspark Neukladow Ruine 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin S-Bahn Botanischer Garten 04-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfkirche B-Hermsdorf Maerz15 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay --DXR 21:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 Schloss img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grunewald-Kirche Bismarckallee 10-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img31 Grete Weiskopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img32 Helmut Just.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img34 Otto Braun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B-Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof 03-2015 img35 Bruno Apitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft in the corners, but ok. Good quality. --W.carter 14:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Bahnhof Berlin Wollankstraße

Hi, der Bahnhof Berlin Wollankstraße liegt nicht in Gesundbrunnen, daher hatte ich die Zuordnungen rausgenommen. Auch die beiden Baudenkmale (Bahnhof und Brücken) sind (real und in der Denkmal-Datenbank des Senats) dem Ortsteil Pankow zugeordnet. Kannst Du Deinen Revert daher bitte nochmal prüfen und ggf. begründen? --Andre de (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@Andre de: Da die Berliner Mauer östlich des Bahndamms verlief und der Bahnhof auch nur für Westberliner nutzbar war, ist es folgerichtig, den Bahnhof Gesundbrunnen zuzuordnen. Ob man ihn auch Pankow zuordnen soll, kann man hingegen streiten. Ich bin für beides. --A.Savin 06:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, aber eine Kategorien-Zuordnung sagt aus "gehört zu" oder "ist Bestandteil von". Von wem der Bahnhof genutzt wird (oder mal 28 Jahre lang genutzt wurde), ist geschichtlich interessant und in den WP-Artikeln auch umfassend dargestellt, hat hier für die Commons-Kategorien aber keine Relevanz. Der Bahnhof liegt einschließlich des vorgelagerten Empfangsgebäudes vollständig NICHT in Gesundbrunnen, sondern in Pankow (siehe z.B. [1]). Daher ist er weder "Train stations in Berlin-Gesundbrunnen" (siehe [[::de:Bahnhof Berlin Wollankstraße]]) und schon garnicht "Cultural heritage monuments in Berlin-Gesundbrunnen" (siehe [[::de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Berlin-Gesundbrunnen]]). Du wirst diese konsequente Zuordnung nach Gebietsgrenzen bei allen (Berliner) Bauwerken finden, den von Dir vorgeschlagenen "Graubereich" gibt es hier nicht. Viele Grüße, --Andre de (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
@Andre de: OK von dieser Ausnahme wusste ich in der Tat nicht, danke für den Hinweis. Werde es korrigieren. --A.Savin 17:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Ok, danke! --Andre de (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Pankow Wollankstr S-Bahnbruecke.jpg

Dein Revert auch hier ist aus meiner Sicht falsch und leider von Dir nicht inhaltlich begründet. Ich hatte im Bearbeitungskommentar dargelegt, dass das angegebene Jahr 1893 nicht stimmen kann, da die Strecke erst 1903 hochgelegt wurde. Technologisch sehen die Pendelstützen sogar noch etwas jünger aus. Auch in der Denkmal-Datenbank steht "nach 1893". Weiterhin hatte ich die Kategorie "Wollankstraße (Berlin-Gesundbrunnen)" hinzugefügt, da auf dem Bild eben diese Straße (hier mit erheblichem Bildanteil des in Gesundbrunnen gelegenen Abschnitts) zu sehen ist. Bitte prüfe Deinen Revert. --Andre de (talk) 23:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Nach der Klärung eins weiter oben füge ich dann die Kategorie "Wollankstraße (Berlin-Gesundbrunnen)" dem Bild wieder hinzu. --Andre de (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Spreepark UAV 04-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Spreepark UAV 04-2017 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Spreepark UAV 04-2017 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Spreepark UAV 04-2017 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Spreepark UAV 04-2017 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I didn't pinged you because you are the deleting admin, it is because you are a native Russian speaker. And speaking of Russian, it is you who comes to my mind when a Russian is needed. ;-) Poké95 04:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img04 Lehde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img05 Lehde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Great colors --DXR 06:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img06 Lehde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img07 Lehde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img08 Lehde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --Pudelek 09:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranienburg Palace 11-2016 statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranienburg Palace 11-2016 statue2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranienburg Palace 11-2016 statue3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranienburg Palace 11-2016 statue4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Very unrealistic perspective due to extreme perspective correction as I think. -- Spurzem 19:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and I wish, the image goes on at the left and right side. --Milseburg 21:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Th-Heuss-Platz UAV 04-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What DXR said! Very good panorama. -- Ikan Kekek 10:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Suedstern UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. These drone pictures are pretty amazing! --DXR 09:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Stadtpark Steglitz UAV 04-2017 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Perspective OK for top-down shot. --Peulle 07:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin InselDerJugend Bruecke 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Kraftwerk Klingenberg UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img01 Jenaplanhaus in Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img02 canal near Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 14:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img09 Schloss Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img10 Nikolaikirche Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img11 Bahnhof Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 14:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Halensee in Grunewald UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty! Good quality. --W.carter 14:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Hufeisensiedlung UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Dorfkirche Dahlem UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Kratzbruch UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img04 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 13:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img07 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img08 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 13:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img10 monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img13 aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tempelhofer Feld UAV 05-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Приветствую! Скажите, пожалуйста, почему вы из сабжа убрали категорию люстр в мосметро? Вроде бы на этот раз одна из них расположена на переднем плане снимка. --Michgrig (talk) 07:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Michgrig, мы с вами уже касались этой темы и вроде бы пришли к обоюдному соглашению, что категории определённых предметов нужны только там, где этим предметам действительно отведено заметное место в композиции. Не вижу смысла поднимать тему повторно. Я уже не говорю, что эти шары на Охотном я бы не стал путать с люстрами. --A.Savin 13:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
В прошлый раз вы сказали, что убрали категорию лавочек, когда оная лавочка была еле видна на фото, про "заметное место в композиции" мы с вами не говорили. В целом, я примерно так же и рассуждаю - возможно, при этом понимание "заметного места в композиции" у нас отличается. Просто, возможно, я сделал много неверных правок, хотелось бы до конца разобраться в вопросе. В разделении люстры vs. светильники я руководствуюсь такой логикой: то, что свисает на палке или цепочке и имеет хотя бы какую-то форму и украшение - это люстра, совсем минималистичный объект, а также не имеющий палки или цепочки - светильник. --Michgrig (talk) 14:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Я думал, что по сути вы со мной были согласны. Ваша инициатива с ревизией всех фоток Мосметро похвальна, но специфические категории необходимо добавлять в разумных пределах. Если, скажем, в категории о лавочках больше двухсот фоток, почти только дряного качества и по меньшей мере девять из десяти вовсе не про лавочки, то какой в этом толк, при том что попробуйте тогда из этих двухсот найти действительно фотографии лавочек, если конкретно они вам нужны. Если не хватает фотографий каких-то объектов в метро — лучше пойти и сделать их и залить сюда, чем засорять категорию плохо подходящими картинками. А что касается люстр, то посмотрите статью в англовики с иллюстрациями. Люстра это подвесной светильник, но не какой угодно, а "под старину", когда вместо ламп там были свечи (потому и называется chandelier). --A.Savin 14:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Давайте тогда попробуем на конкретных примерах. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, какие-нибудь из моих правок и скажите, где я прав, а где нет. Пока еще не все станции обработаны, есть возможность скорректироваться. --Michgrig (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Ну, по массовости ваших правок я вряд ли могу их все отслеживать (за исключением моих фоток из списка наблюдения), так что в основном проверка на вашей совести остаётся. Но конкретно с Category:Chandeliers in Moscow Metro у нас явно перебор и там есть и станции, где не chandeliers а просто light fixtures (Новослободская, Белорусская-рад., Курская-рад., Алексеевская, Маяковская и др.) --A.Savin 17:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Я не прошу отслеживать все, хотя бы с десяток навскидку. Ну да ладно, постараюсь учесть и исправиться. Люстры посмотрю и прорежу от обычных светильников. --Michgrig (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin InselDerJugend UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DJI Phantom 4Pro 04-2017 img4 rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DJI Phantom 4Pro 04-2017 img1 RC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DJI Phantom 4Pro 04-2017 img2 flight battery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DJI Phantom 4Pro 04-2017 img3 in flight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Alte Post Steglitz Bergstr UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Stralau UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit distorted but ok I guess --Poco a poco 20:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 20:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ForstLausitz 09-2016 photo10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 17:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img02 window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img06 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img14 water tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img03 canal near Luebbenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img05 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 07:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prenzlau 10-2016 photo03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spreewald 04-2016 img12 Bahnhof Luebben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Insulaner UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WerderHavel 04-2016 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img01 monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img03 MarketSq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img09 chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img11 monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angermuende 05-2017 img12 aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks a bit too distorted, but that's the rules here. Good quality. --W.carter 17:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Th-Heuss-Platz UAV 04-2017 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Park am Gleisdreieck UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and IMO an excellent composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Liebesinsel UAV 04-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Alboinplatz Blanke Helle UAV 05-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Stadtpark Steglitz UAV 04-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Traffic lights vs. traffic signals

И снова здравствуйте! Заметил, что есть две ветки категорий: Category:Traffic lights by country и Category:Traffic signals by country. Вроде бы эти понятия обозначают одно и то же. Вы не в курсе, чем отличается наполнение соответствующих категорий? P.S. У вас на СО опять переполнение шаблонов. --Michgrig (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Как я понял, lights - это привычный "красный-жёлтый-зелёный", а signals - более обобщённый термин. Например, специальные светофоры для выделенных полос, типа как на этой картинке справа. --A.Savin 16:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstadt Wittenberg 09-2016 photo07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo A.Savin,

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Berlin Hufeisensiedlung UAV 04-2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Hufeisensiedlung UAV 04-2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

FOP-Russia

Приветствую. Поясните пожалуйста эту и схожие с ней правки по удалению категории Category:Russian FOP cases/pending. --Insider (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Так как речь о плакатах, они даже в самых панорамно-свободных странах по-любому под копирайтом. --A.Savin 11:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
У меня нет возможности посмотреть удалённый файл, но на КУ написано: "No freedom of panorama for statues". Поэтому предполагаю что там всё же статуя была. В Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Summary table в таблице приводятся и 2D artwork для общественных мест, см. Багамы, Хорватию, Кубу, ... --Insider (talk) 11:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Конкретно с этой номинацией меня спамбот, заливающий новые фотки под тем же именем, сбил с толку, уже исправлено. С остальными всё сходится, сюда и в похожие номинации не нужно добавлять про FoP. --A.Savin 11:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Как тогда эти номинации потом найти в случае введения свободы панорамы по образу Кубы/Хорватии для восстановления? Подобные категории предусмотрены только для 3D-объектов? --Insider (talk) 11:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Свобода панорамы затрагивает только постоянно находящиеся в одном месте объекты. Просто приклеить плакат не достаточно нигде. --A.Savin 11:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здравстствуйте, этот файл с матерщиной - File:Карлин Лев Николаевич, некролог на сайте университета.jpg требует удаления.--1.b2-b4 (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Request

Hei i want to say that this is my own picture. can you please delete this because this was just uploaded by mistake, can you please delete this picture please? Baloch rukhshani Bloch khan (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)