User talk:Mike1979 Russia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the Commons, Mike1979 Russia!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Taigei class submarine.svg

[edit]

Hello, I was evaluating the work to do in order to draw the sketch of the Taigei class submarine.

As this class is very close to File:Soryu class submarine.svg, my first idea was to modify the file you made.

But I noticed that the quality of your file is really high. Then, if you do it, you will produce a far more better drawing than myself.

Anyway, let me know if you can do the file, or if you prefer to let me do it.

Borvan53 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, I can draw the Taigei class submarine. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. File:Taigei class submarine.svg Mike1979 Russia (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Splendid ! Thank you very much. I allowed myself to change the frame of the picture to have a clearer comparison with Soryu (look at w:fr:Classe Taigei#Caractéristiques). Borvan53 (talk) 09:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd BK-13 2023-07-16 6671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Special Machine Building Plant 2023-07-16 6455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Sudoverf Railway Station 2023-07-16 6467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd BK-13 2023-07-16 6669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Check the perspective, please. The street light is leaning to the right IMO. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed --Mike1979 Russia 17:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Draceane 20:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Panorama Museum ISU-152M 2023-07-16 6590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Panorama Museum 5 cm Pak-38 ATG 2023-07-16 6607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Panorama Museum BM-13NMM Rocket Launcher 2023-07-16 6587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Strezhen Tugboat on Volgo-Don Canal 2023-07-13 6432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Geroyev Stalingrada Ave 38 House 2023-07-13 6438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good light, impressive perspective. --Aristeas 19:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Krasnoarmeyskaya Railway Station 2023-07-13 6444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Strezhen Tugboat on Volgo-Don Canal 2023-07-13 6434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Panorama Museum Sd.Kfz. 250-1 2023-07-16 6604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Shipyard 2023-07-16 6452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is OK, but some more categories and info about the awards would be welcomed. --C messier 16:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Categories and description added. --Mike1979 Russia 10:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Panorama Museum T-34-76 STZ Tank 2023-07-16 6648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Sudoverf Railway Station 2023-07-16 6469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Again, the blue colour should be fixed. --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. I'm colorblind. I saw dark blue not purple. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 08:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Draceane 22:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Krasnoarmeyskaya Railway Station 2023-07-13 6442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs some color and shadows correction (чуть прибрать фиолетовое и желтое и высветлить тени слева) -- --Екатерина Борисова 23:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tryed to fix. --Mike1979 Russia 13:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK now --Екатерина Борисова 23:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Krasnoarmeyskiy Bridge 2023-07-13 6437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taigei class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SSN575.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Bloated SVG --Iketsi 21:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain what do you mean? --Mike1979 Russia 06:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support All good now. I appreciate your work. --Iketsi 06:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SSN578.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Bloated SVG --Iketsi 21:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain what do you mean? --Mike1979 Russia 06:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support All good now. I appreciate your work. --Iketsi 06:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Tatra T3 Tram No 3001 2023-07-18 6797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd The Rotunda 2023-07-18 6855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Stoletova av 2023-07-18 6802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Sevastopolskaya emb 2023-07-18 6819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Lighting Pole with The Rotunda 2023-07-18 6854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Bas-relief on the Marshal Chuykov str 1 House 2023-07-18 6837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Church of St John the Forerunner 2023-07-18 6839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Central Stairs 2023-07-18 6857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Church of the Nativity of Mary 2023-07-18 6800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valeriy Chkalov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valeriy Chkalov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 21:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valeriy Chkalov and Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 13:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Afanasiy Nikitin in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 10:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valeriy Chkalov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 05:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgograd Sarepta backwater 2023-07-18 6814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavel Bazhov in Volgograd 2023-07-18 6936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower and Wall Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-20 5578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate Tower Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-22 5986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Terespol Gate 2023-02-18 2812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-02-18 2769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 21:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-02-18 2746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Belfry of the Parish House 2023-02-18 2823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Belfry of the Parish House 2023-02-18 2827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Brest-Central Railway Station 2023-02-18 2725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 16:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Brest-Central Railway Station 2023-02-18 2730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Brest-Central Railway Station 2023-02-18 2727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit soft but OK. --Augustgeyler 10:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Brest-Central Railway Station 2023-02-18 2724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress North Gate 2023-02-18 2731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-02-18 2826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Plaque near Chełm Gate 2023-02-18 2773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Museum of the defens 2023-02-18 2744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Terespol Gate 2023-02-18 2816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose perspective distortion needs correction here. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New version. Is it ok now? --Mike1979 Russia 14:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Well done!  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Ring Barracks 2023-02-18 2764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Chełm Gate 2023-02-18 2797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not the best light. But well composed. --Augustgeyler 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Barracks Ruin 2023-02-18 2821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Ring Barracks 2023-02-18 2757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest Fortress Kobrinskoye Fortification East Fort 2023-02-18 2737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]