User talk:Siren-Com

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<mise en sommeil (rajouter {{)> User:MiszaBot/config |archive = User talk:Siren-Com/Archive %(counter)d |algo = old(31d) |counter = 7 |maxarchivesize = 14K |archiveheader = <!>{Talkarchive}</!> |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 <mise en sommeil (rajouter }})>

Bienvenue!

Bonjour, Siren-Com, et bienvenue sur Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour vos contributions. J'espère ue vous allez vous plaire ici et que vous déciderez d'y rester. Voici quelques liens utiles aux nouveaux utilisateurs:

J'espère que vous apprécierez d'éditer ici et d'être un Wikipédien! Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, vous pourriez vouloir vous faire un compte utilisateur sur le Wikipédia de votre langue préférée, ou sur l'un des autres projets. Incidemment, n'oubliez pas de signer vos commentaires sur les pages de discussions à l'aide de quatre tildes (~~~~), ce qui donnera automatiquement votre pseudonyme et la date, ou de trois tildes pour votre nom seul. Si vous avez avez des questions, laissez un commentaire sur le puit du village, ou posez-les moi sur ma page de discussion. Et encore bienvenue !

Avec toutes mes excuses pour ce chaleureux accueil ! ~ bayo or talk 10:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Message historique
Je te souhaite la bienvenue sur le Wikipédia francophone ! Aineko 28 jun 2004 à 17:08 (CEST)


(Poussé hors de Wikipédia francophone le 31 mars 2023, parti sans regret d'un projet en cours de wokisation)



Je vous écoute...

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louis XVI 2 sols 1791 A avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Union et Force 5 francs an 8 A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeton Louis XV états d'Artois 1722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Technical quality is good. --Plozessor 07:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1972 Piso GF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (I understand that you took the picture, and the 'public domain' template refers to the artwork on the coin, not the picture.) --Plozessor 08:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louis XV 1722 jeton Etats de Bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charles X médaille de la Charte 1824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Invalides mnt La Médaille Militaire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcus Aurelius sesterce Cos II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Severus Alexander Cos III - 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Gemito

[edit]

Hello. You photographed the Vincenzo Gemito exhibition. Please tell me, did you photograph the statue of Narcissus? --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sure than if I have seen this statue in the exibit in Paris, I will take the picture and put it on "Commons", so I think this statue was not present at the exibit. Not lukky ! ... (after more research) : I have seen again my rushes of 2019 and I have found a picture of Narcisssus but it is blur (not quite sharp picture) and the description is : Atelier Romain, Statuette of Dionysus-Narcissus, Ist century after JC. Naples, museum of national archeology. (62 cm) and not a work of Gemito. I have the book "Gemito" from Paris-Museum. This statue is reproduced, and one of "Fonderie Chiurrazzi" cire perdue copie 61 cm, and the statue by Gemito : 69 cm, 1886, (exposed at the Exposition Universelle d'Anvers, 1885) museum real Bosco di Capodimonte. In this catalogue : This two statues were exposed in Paris (number 105 and 106) ! and I don't take picture !!! It is un bilievable !! Why I don't take this tow pictures ?. If you want to see the blur picture, I can download it on Commons. - Siren-Com (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! France Directoire - 2 décimes l'an 4 A (1795).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sorry, but the coins aren't cut out correctly. At some places they have brown edges and at other places (like at the top of the left coin) parts are missing and blended with the white background. --Plozessor 05:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I see, I will make another, the problem is about uni directionel lightning and little no sticte orthogonal position. - Siren-Com 16:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, done, you can see another version of this image... - Siren-Com 14:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Hi again. I wrote to you in a section archived to User talk:Siren-Com/Archive 6#Reminder 14:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC) about making a malformed deletion request. In this edit, you made another one: not including reason, year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; not notifying; and not transcluding. Such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." I have redirected the category instead, as it stood for almost five years with the unaccented spelling and had three members at the time of your unorthodox rename (see COM:RAC for the proper procedure), and adjusted Wikidata.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marche contre l' antisémitisme Paris 12-10-2023 - 17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo by Harcourt Studio published in 1960, it is definitively not in the French public domain (70 years after publication for collective works). We can undelete in 2056 when it enters the public domain in the US.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]