Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T04:26:44.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Walter Lippmann, emotion, and the history of international theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2021

Eric Van Rythoven Open the ORCID record for Eric Van Rythoven [Opens in a new window]
Eric Van Rythoven*
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ericvanrythoven@cmail.carleton.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent ‘emotion turn’ in international theory is widely viewed as a cutting-edge development which pushes the field in fundamentally new directions. Challenging this narrative, this essay returns to the historical works of Walter Lippmann to show how thinking about emotions has been central to international theory for far longer than currently appreciated. Deeply troubled by his experience with propaganda during the First World War, Lippmann spent the next several decades thinking about the relationship between emotion, mass politics, and the challenges of foreign policy in the modern world. The result was a sophisticated account of the role of emotional stereotypes and symbols in mobilizing democratic publics to international action. I argue that a return to Lippmann's ideas offers two advantages. First, it shows his thinking on emotion and mass politics formed an important influence for key disciplinary figures like Angell, Morgenthau, Niebuhr, and Waltz. Second, it shows why the relationship between emotion and democracy should be understood as a vital concern for international theory. Vacillating between scepticism and hope, Lippmann's view of democracy highlights a series of challenges in modern mass politics – disinformation, the unintended consequences of emotional symbols, and responsibility for the public's emotional excesses – which bear directly on democracies' ability to engage the world.

Keywords

Disciplinary historydisinformationemotionpublic opinionstereotypessymbols
Type
Research Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2022 , pp. 526 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Thomas, and Corbet, Sylvie. 2020. “Hypocrisy gone viral? Officials set bad COVID-19 examples.” Associated Press, May 27, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2020. https://apnews.com/article/349aacd2f75623d39a1093a7e7f37675.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1922. The Press and the Organisation of Society. London: The Labour Publishing Company Limited.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1927. The Public Mind: Its Disorders: Its Exploitation. New York: E.P. Dutton & Company.Google Scholar
Ariffin, Yohan. 2016. “Introduction: How Emotions Can Explain Outcomes in International Relations.” In Emotions in International Politics, edited by Ariffin, Yohan, Coicaud, Jean-Marc and Popovski, Vesselin, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Lucian M. 1999. Creating International Studies: Angell, Mitrany, and the Liberal Tradition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Lucian M. 2002. “Did the Realist–Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations.” International Relations 16 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Lucian M. 2006. “Where are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations?” Review of International Studies 32 (2): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2019. “Writing the World (Remix).” In Historiographical Investigations in International Relations, edited by Schmidt, Brian C. and Guilhot, Nicolas, 15–50. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessner, Daniel, and Guilhot, Nicolas. 2015. “How Realism Waltzed Off: Liberalism and Decisionmaking in Kenneth Waltz's Neorealism.” International Security 40 (2): 87–118.Google Scholar
Bessner, Daniel, and Guilhot, Nicolas. 2019. “Who Decides?” In The Decisionist Imagination: Sovereignty, Social Science and Democracy in the 20th Century, edited by Bessner, Daniel and Guilhot, Nicolas, 1–26. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Bew, John. 2016. Realpolitik: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. 2008. “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.” Review of International Studies 34 (1): 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottom, William P., and Kong, Dejun Tony. 2012. “‘The Casual Cruelty of our Prejudices’: On Walter Lippmann's Theory of Stereotype and its ‘Obliteration’ in Psychology and Social Science.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 48 (4): 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, James W. 2009. Communication as Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, Marquis, and Reston, James. eds. 1959. Walter Lippmann and his Times. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Clément, Maéva, and Sangar, Eric. 2018. “Introduction: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities for the Study of Emotions.” In Researching Emotions in International Relations: Methodological Perspectives on the Emotion Turn, edited by Clément, Maéva and Sangar, Eric, 1–30. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships.” International Security 24 (4): 116–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2014. “Institutionalizing Passion in World Politics: Fear and Empathy.” International Theory 6 (3): 535–57.Google Scholar
Crilley, Rhys. 2018. “Book Review Essay: International Relations in the age of ‘Post-Truth’ Politics.” International Affairs 94 (2): 417–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilley, Rhys, and Chatterje-Doody, Precious. 2019. “Security Studies in the age of ‘Post-Truth’ Politics: In Defence of Poststructuralism.” Critical Studies on Security 7 (2): 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry Jansen, Sue. 2009. “Phantom Conflict: Lippmann, Dewey, and the Fate of the Public in Modern Society.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 6 (3): 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, Constance. 2019a. “The Politics of Twitter: Emotions and the Power of Social Media.” International Political Sociology 13 (4): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, Constance. 2019b. “Popular Culture, Post-Truth and Emotional Framings of World Politics.” Australian Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 543–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Jakub, and Daniel, Jan. 2019. “‘Putin, You Suck’: Affective Sticking Points in the Czech Narrative on ‘Russian Hybrid Warfare’.” Political Psychology 40 (6): 1267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2021. “The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions are Self-Undermining.” International Organization 75 (2): 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattah, Khaled, and Fierke, K.M.. 2009. “A Clash of Emotions: The Politics of Humiliation and Political Violence in the Middle East.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, K.M. 2014. “Emotion and Intentionality.” International Theory 6 (3): 563–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Thomas. 2003. The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jean. 2014. “Walter Lippmann, the Indispensable Opposition.” In Trained Capacities: John Dewey, Rhetoric, and Democratic Practice, edited by Jackson, Brian and Clark, Gregory, 142–58. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2008. “The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory.” International Political Sociology 2 (4): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. ed. 2011. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2019. “Introduction.” In Historiographical Investigations in International Relations, edited by Schmidt, Brian C. and Guilhot, Nicolas, 1–14. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gullace, Nicoletta. 2009. “Barbaric Anti-Modernism: Representations of the ‘Hun’ in Britain, America, Australia, and Beyond.” In Picture This: World War 1 Posters and Visual Culture, edited by James, Pearl, 61–78. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Todd, and Ross, Andrew A.G.. 2015. “Affective Politics after 9/11.” International Organization 69 (4): 847–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Todd, and Ross, Andrew A.G.. 2019. “Rethinking Affective Experience and Popular Emotion: World War I and the Construction of Group Emotion in International Relations.” Political Psychology 40 (6): 1357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnett, Liane. 2020. “‘The Impossible Possibility of Love’: Reinhold Niebuhr's Thought on Racial Justice.” Journal of International Political Theory 17 (2): 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Naomi. 2020. “Sentimental Politics or Structural Injustice? The Ambivalence of Emotions for Political Responsibility.” International Theory 12 (3): 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Jack. 2011. “‘When You Think of the Taliban, Think of the Nazis’: Teaching Americans ‘9/11’ in NBC's The West Wing.” Millennium 40 (1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homolar, Alexandra, and Scholz, Ronny. 2019. “The Power of Trump-Speak: Populist Crisis Narratives and Ontological Security.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 344–64.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2020. “COVID-19 Fuelling Anti-Asian Racism and Xenophobia Worldwide.” March 12, 2020. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/12/covid-19-fueling-anti-asian-racism-and-xenophobia-worldwide.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Emma, and Bleiker, Roland. 2014. “Theorizing Emotions in World Politics.” International Theory 6 (3): 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Emma. 2016. Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. vol. 2. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim. 2004. “Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War.” International Security 29 (1): 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschut, Simon. 2014. “Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-Allied Conflict Management.” Review of International Studies 40 (3): 533–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
la Cour, Christina. 2020. “Theorising Digital Disinformation in International Relations.” International Politics 57 (4): 704–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanoszka, Alexander. 2019. “Disinformation in International Politics.” European Journal of International Security 4 (2): 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1927. “Review of the Public Mind. Its Exploitation.” American Journal of Sociology 33 (1): 142–3.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 2018. “Symbols and World Politics: Towards a Long-Term Perspective on Historical Trends and Contemporary Challenges.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (3): 931–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1920. Liberty and the News. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1929. A Preface to Morals. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. The Public Philosophy. Boston: The New American Library.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 2010 [1922]. Public Opinion. Middletown: Feather Trail Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 2017 [1927]. The Phantom Public. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markwica, Robin. 2018. Emotional Choices: How the Logic of Affect Shapes Coercive Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, Allison. 2018. Political Realism in Apocalyptic Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2006. “Human Nature and the First Image: Emotion in International Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development 9 (3): 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2010. “Emotional Beliefs.” International Organization 64 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2014. “Feeling Like a State: Social Emotion and Identity.” International Theory 6 (3): 515–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.D. Bruce. 1986. Norman Angell and the Futility of war. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Milne, David. 2017. “A Lapsed Progressive: Walter Lippmann and US Foreign Policy, 1914–1945.” In Progressivism and US Foreign Policy Between the World Wars, edited by Cochran, Molly and Navari, Cornelia, 269–94. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1947. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. London: Latimer House Limited.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 2006. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia. 1989. “The Great Illusion Revisited: The International Theory of Norman Angell.” Review of International Studies 15 (4): 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1930. “Review: A Preface to Morals by Walter Lippmann.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 149 (1): 199–200.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1955. “A Matter of Popular Will: Essays in the Public Philosophy.” New York Times, February 20, 1955, 3, 18, BR3.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1959. “The Democratic Elite and American Foreign Policy.” In Walter Lippmann and His Times, edited by Childs, Marquis and Reston, James, 168–88. New York: Harcourt, Bruce and Company.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, Cian. 2011. “Talking about Just War: Obama in Oslo, Bush at War.” Politics 31 (2): 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oprysko, Caitlin, and Luthi, Susannah. 2020. “Trump labels himself ‘a wartime president’ combating coronavirus.” Politico, March 18, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2020. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/18/trump-administration-self-swab-coronavirus-tests-135590.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1998. “Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 409–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, Elian, and Faizi, Fatima. 2020. “I.C.C. Allows Afghanistan War Crimes Inquiry to Proceed, Angering U.S.” New York Times, March 5, 2020. Accessed February 6, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/05/world/europe/afghanistan-war-crimes-icc.html.Google Scholar
Penttinen, Elina. 2019. “Emotions and Mindfulness in IR: Moving Beyond ‘Anti-Humanism’.” In Methodology and Emotion in International Relations: Parsing the Passions, edited by Van Rythoven, Eric and Sucharov, Mira, 43–57. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, John Durham. 1989. “Democracy and American Mass Communication Theory: Dewey, Lippmann, Lazarsfeld.” Communication 11 (3): 199–220.Google Scholar
Peters, John Durham. 2012. Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisenzein, Rainer. 2006. “Arnold's Theory of Emotion in Historical Perspective.” Cognition and Emotion 20 (7): 920–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2014. “Emotions and the Social.” International Theory 6 (3): 568–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Daniel. 1983. “Felix Frankfurter and Reinhold Niebuhr: 1940–1964.” Journal of Law and Religion 1 (2): 325–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösch, Felix. 2015. Power, Knowledge, and Dissent in Morgenthau's Worldview. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew A.G. 2013. “Realism, Emotion, and Dynamic Allegiances in Global Politics.” International Theory 5 (2): 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew A.G. 2014. Mixed Emotions: Beyond Fear and Hatred in International Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sasley, Brent. 2010. “Affective Attachments and Foreign Policy: Israel and the 1993 Oslo Accords.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 687–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasley, Brent. 2011. “Theorizing States’ Emotions.” International Studies Review 13 (3): 452–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 2002. “On the History and Historiography of International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A., 3–28. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 2019. “Internalism versus Externalism in the Disciplinary History of International Relations.” In Historiographical Investigations in International Relations, edited by Schmidt, Brian C. and Guilhot, Nicolas, 127–48. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 2008. “The ‘Lippmann-Dewey Debate’ and the Invention of Walter Lippmann as an Anti-Democrat 1986–1996.” International Journal of Communication 2: 1031–42.Google Scholar
Schuett, Robert. 2010. Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations: The Resurrection of Realist Man. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2012a. “Human Nature and the Limits of the Self: Hans Morgenthau on Love and Power.” International Studies Review 14 (2): 201–24.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2012b. “‘I Wasn't Angry, Because I Couldn't Believe it was Happening’: Affect and Discourse in Responses to 9/11.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 907–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2019. “Rhythm and Mobilization in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (4): 1001–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Ronald. 1980. The American Century. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2021. “‘The Cruelty of Righteous People’: Niebuhr on the Urgency of Cruelty.” Journal of International Political Theory 17 (2): 203–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subotic, Jelena, and Steele, Brent J.. 2018. “Moral Injury in International Relations.” Journal of Global Security Studies 3 (4): 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjalve, Vibeke Schou. 2008. Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Patriotic Dissent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rythoven, Eric. 2017. “Fear in the Crowd or Fear of the Crowd? The Dystopian Politics of Fear in International Relations.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (1): 33–49.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1967. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Whipple, Mark. 2005. “The Dewey-Lippmann Debate Today: Communication Distortions, Reflective Agency, and Participatory Democracy.” Sociological Theory 23 (2): 156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2004. “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 58 (4): 633–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2009. “Waltz, Realism and Democracy.” International Journal 23 (3): 328–40.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2013. “In the Beginning: The International Relations Enlightenment and the Ends of International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 647–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar