Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth
Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) at 23:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: 2015 judgment of the High Court of Australia |
A fact from Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 09:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- ... that in Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth, the High Court of Australia found the use of a labour-hire company to deprive employees of minimum entitlements constituted a sham? Source: https://www.smh.com.au/business/small-business/high-court-finds-quest-engaged-in-sham-contracting-mischief-20151203-gle1fe.html
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Letter to the American people
- Comment: * I am very welcome to suggestions for a different hook. The facts in summary are: a hotel tried to convince three employees to sign an agreement to work as contractors. This deprived them of their minimum entitlements. This sort of arrangement is called 'sham contracting' in australia. I do not love my hook. Proposed amendments welcome.
- QPQ Template:Did you know nominations/Letter to the American people
Moved to mainspace by MaxnaCarta (talk). Self-nominated at 22:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Not a review but a potential alt hook:
- ALT1: ... that an Australian High Court case found a hotel chain to have used third-party contractors to avoid paying employees their required benefits? ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I prefer this hook. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 08:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough. ALT1 short enough, interesting, and sourced AGF; might be worth naming the case but I'll let the prepbuilder decide that. Every paragraph ends with a cite. No neutrality issues found, no maintenance templates found, no valid copyright complaints. QPQ done. Let's roll.--Launchballer 09:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I prefer this hook. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 08:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 23:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: KwanFlakes (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Picking up and beginning this review. Thank you for improving and expanding this article @MaxnaCarta. Since I am still new to GA reviewing an experienced reviewer will also be taking a look. I should have some initial comments in the next 48 hours. KwanFlakes (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay @MaxnaCarta, I’ve had a couple of major things come up this week so will be unable to get to this properly until after the weekend. Thanks for your patience! KwanFlakes (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)