Talk:National Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Mehedi Abedin in topic Did you know nomination
Bangladesh Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that Bangladeshi
government agencyNational Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime collected ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to৳18 billion orUS$150 million in 2023) fromcorruptionsuspects which the court deemed was illegal?
Created by Vinegarymass911 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.
Mehedi Abedin 03:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
- Interesting article. All parts of the article are cited with no problems with copyright. The stated hook is also mentioned in the article with proper sourcing. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
- Reverting promotion to prep; the hook is 223 prose characters including its "equivalent" parenthetical, way too far about the 200-character maximum. Vinegarymass911, please propose a shorter hook. The current hook's "from corruption suspects which the court deemed was illegal" has confusing antecedents; it's not the suspects that were illegal, but presumably how they acquired the funds. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: What about now? I can see the new hook has 189 characters.
- Still ungrammatical (even more with the removal of "government agency"). Also, striking out parts of the old hook is not proposing a new hook. Please write them out again, i.e.: ... that Bangladeshi National Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime collected ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to US$150 million in 2023) from suspects which the court deemed was illegal? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: What about now? I can see the new hook has 189 characters.
- Reverting promotion to prep; the hook is 223 prose characters including its "equivalent" parenthetical, way too far about the 200-character maximum. Vinegarymass911, please propose a shorter hook. The current hook's "from corruption suspects which the court deemed was illegal" has confusing antecedents; it's not the suspects that were illegal, but presumably how they acquired the funds. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to US$150 million in 2023) was collected from corruption suspects by a Bangladeshi government agency which the court deemed was illegal in 2017?