Talk:Securitization (international relations)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mbmorley. Peer reviewers: Nelkarhili, JoonDay.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Article Review
editThe definition/ description focuses on the empirical, process oriented aspect of the theory. Included in the background should be a discussion on the break from traditional security studies. What gaps does a theory of securitization seek to fill? Mbmorley (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Criticism and responses
editFirst of all the section is not cited, which it should be. Second of all, that's an odd perspective on social science. Science should not be measured by it's usefulness, especially social science. Political science has it's value, because it analyses and criticizes political reality. I believe it's a common misconception that political scientists become actual politicians.--Arjab (talk) 16:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Good shout. I replaced the section with cited criticism. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)