Gabriel601

If any of my article, gets nominated for an AFD, apologies to whoever nominated it, waiting for me to convince them with more reference while you can just go to Google & do the research by yourself if you feel what I have provided on the page wasn’t enough before it was accepted through Submitting for review. I am currently undergoing some major problems I need to focus on not even around Wikipedia, which doesn’t gives me the strength to start picking up sources from Google to save an article like I was paid to write them which I wasn’t. I don’t care about the effort either, used in writing the article. It was actually cool creating. And thanks to every editors making a meaningful discussion to why an article should be keep or delete. But one thing I don't understand is that why still nominating an article for AFD when it was accepted by a Page reviewer. Does that mean that who so ever accepted the page wasn't qualified. Then why was the permission tool granted in the first place. This happened to one of my article Portable and ever since, I have been like oh wow what then the point creating articles if life can be moving this way. The editor who even nominated the article wasn't even because the page didn't meet up to the Wikipedia general notability guideline. He nominated the page because he feel attacked by me not supporting him on his article which was nominated for an AFD which the reference can be found here. I feel life is crazy over here and at the same time funny which doesn't worth the energy to start fighting back. So, if you are a new user over here and you are reading this. You just have to understand on how to deal with different people mentality rather than fighting back which doesn't help but makes you feel immature.

Note : This AFD section might be deleted in the future if need be.