Mikeblas
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Academic journals of Indonesia
editA tag has been placed on Category:Academic journals of Indonesia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Ketchum, Idaho
editRegarding your edit:
I did not add this reference. It was already there but, because it had already been invoked further up, I converted it to a short form. I can see that it is redundant, perhaps it would be better to use the cite web template than a bare URL? Gaius Cornelius (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, I'm referring to this edit, where you added undefined references to the external links section of the article. While you did declare these reference names above, invoking {{reflist}} produces the reference list and then clears all the names. As a result, your edit left two undefined reference errors and added the Category:Pages with broken reference names tracking category. Before your edit, there were no referencing errors in the article. Why do you think it important for external links to have references? Since Wikipedia is not its own reference, why would referencing *anything* to WikiData be useful? -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Olaofe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- My edit was not vandalism, and was constructive. You should retract your accusation.
- The material I removed was unreferenced -- the reference named
"2023-24"was invoked, but never defined. This generated an error when the page rendered, and added the page to Category:Pages with broken reference names. Your reversion re-introduced the undefined reference without referencing the material that it re-added to the article. Fortunately, Rupert1904 was able to promptly add an appropriate source and correct your error. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Template:Baseballstats
editHi, a question regarding Template:Baseballstats and your recent edit to it. I'm seeing that uses of the template which include an asterisk before the template render slightly differently that uses of the template that lack a leading asterisk -- the latter seem to end up with an extra linefeed. See, for example, the article Boston Red Sox minor league players. For some players, there is an extra linefeed being inserted; examples include Miguel Bleis and Kristian Campbell. An example of no extra linefeed is Liu Chih-jung. The difference being if an editor types in
* {{baseballstats ...- or
{{baseballstats ...
I looked at the source of the template, and I don't understand why the leading asterisk is having such an effect. I also don't know if the recent addition of "nobullet" has somehow caused this or not. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! By "extra linefeed", I think you mean more whitespace between the preceding paragraph and the paragraph where the baseball stats template is invoked. Is that right? (Wikipedia renders HTML, so linefeeds
\ndon't really get involved ...) I'm not sure why that would happen either. I've taken a whack at fixing it; see Template:Baseballstats/testcases and let me know what you think. -- Mikeblas (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks much for following up. Yes, I meant a visible gap, vertically. I looked at Template:Baseballstats/testcases and the version using Baseballstats/sandbox looks correct (as in, no visible gap). If you are comfortable with whatever change was made to accomplish that, it would be good to update the template itself. Thank you. Dmoore5556 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Great! I've moved it over. -- Mikeblas (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks much for following up. Yes, I meant a visible gap, vertically. I looked at Template:Baseballstats/testcases and the version using Baseballstats/sandbox looks correct (as in, no visible gap). If you are comfortable with whatever change was made to accomplish that, it would be good to update the template itself. Thank you. Dmoore5556 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Mikeblas! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 00:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC) |
Template inquiry
editMikeblas, saw you were an administrator and also involved with Template:Baseballstats so thought you'd be a good resource to connect with. I'm hoping to create a new template similar to baseball stats but with gymnast biographies. Would you be open to assistance as I'm unable to edit templates? Thanks! GauchoDude (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- I give it a try every once in a while, but I'm by no means a template wizard. But maybe it's still possible that I can help -- what have you got so far? What are you trying to make? -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: if you're able to literally just create a copy/paste version of something like Template:Sports links, I would be able to advise as to edits. Alternatively, once a baseline template was created by us, I could seek template editor permissions and that would help from a long-term perspective. GauchoDude (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- {{Sports links}} is very elaborate; it's a special instance of {{#invoke:External links|getLinks}}, which pulls links from WikiData. It supports a ton of different sports, including gymnastics already. I'm not sure I can help, but I still don't know what it is you want -- maybe it's adequate to add more properties to that, or ... ? -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: if you're able to literally just create a copy/paste version of something like Template:Sports links, I would be able to advise as to edits. Alternatively, once a baseline template was created by us, I could seek template editor permissions and that would help from a long-term perspective. GauchoDude (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: Yes, {{Sports links}} looks to be *too* inclusive as if used as intended for sports, including baseball, it would actually stop working. As such, a gymnastics-only one, similar to other sport-specific templates more widely used like {{Baseballstats}}, {{Basketballstats}}, {{Footballstats}}, etc. is likely the best scenario. I would be more than capable of editing it down (we'd likely need only lines 1-10, 324-332, 524-645, and 653-703 of the current {{Sports links}}) and with editor privileges would be able to upkeep it moving forward including the addition or subtraction of further links utilizing Wikidata and the corresponding properties. GauchoDude (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm getting lost, sorry. So you don't want something like {{Sports links}}? -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: Yes, {{Sports links}} looks to be *too* inclusive as if used as intended for sports, including baseball, it would actually stop working. As such, a gymnastics-only one, similar to other sport-specific templates more widely used like {{Baseballstats}}, {{Basketballstats}}, {{Footballstats}}, etc. is likely the best scenario. I would be more than capable of editing it down (we'd likely need only lines 1-10, 324-332, 524-645, and 653-703 of the current {{Sports links}}) and with editor privileges would be able to upkeep it moving forward including the addition or subtraction of further links utilizing Wikidata and the corresponding properties. GauchoDude (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: All good. I want something right now exactly like Sports links, but instead of it being so all-encompassing, having it specific to just the gymnastics space if that makes sense. GauchoDude (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)