Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/42nd Regiment - Gallipoli 1915

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 18:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

42nd Regiment - Gallipoli 1915 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

English book not released yet and doesn't appear like there is coverage on this unreleased book yet. Sources in article do not establish notability of the Turkish (or unreleased English) book - one source is the book itself, and the other source is there to source post-Gallipoli postings of the regiment. In my BEFORE for additional Turkish sources (all be it hampered by my far from perfect Turkish) I was unable to find additional reviews. Icewhiz (talk) 11:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Does not meet WP:TBK guidelines and waiting for translation is WP:CRYSTAL. However, non-delete results are preferred. Information about the units could be merged with Order of battle for the Gallipoli Campaign or potentially more specific Landing at Cape Helles. Book could also eventually be used as a WP:RS for those articles. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 14:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.