Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dublin statues and their nicknames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Statues in Dublin , clearly no consensus to delete. Exact title can be changed editorially, but I believe this one is more in line with current practices (editorial opinion only). lifebaka++ 17:07, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dublin statues and their nicknames

Unreferenced material with concocted nicknames (in many cases). Basically, a work of fiction. Might be more acceptable if the "nicknames" part was removed; or relegated to a referenced section within the article on "Dublin Statues" Sarah777 (talk) 23:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reworked - has potential as a topic and could be the basis of a decent article, but currently I agree with Sarah777: needs to be moved to something like statues in Dublin and reworked extensively to ensure it is essentially accurate. Warofdreams talk 00:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rework. The nicknames are a small part of a useful article, and come from a single web-site. If they are widely used, they would be worth keeping, but if not, take them out and move the 90% that remains. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still no references

Two more months and nothing except additional fiction added. If we don't take a decision here soon I'll delete everything that isn't referenced and move the article to "List of Dublin statues". Sarah777 (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Dublin statues & tone down uncited nicknames & up the encyclopedic content per the above. Lucian Sunday (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Move for same reasons outlined above, and probably also because of WP:COMMONNAME - if people wanted to know a nickname, chances are they'd look up the statue article, not a "statue nickname" article. --HighKing (talk) 20:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Dublin statues (not sure it should be a list though), but do not delete content which, albeit unreferenced, is already tagged as such and could be very difficult to replace. MediaMob (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.