Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperbeard Games

Hyperbeard Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP heavily with a lack of significant coverage about the company itself. They only seem known for the fine they paid to the FTC. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment mobilegamer.biz, yayomg.com IgelRM (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The sources provided in the comment above, the first is based entirely on an interview, fails ORGIND, and the second is a review of one game, fails CORPDEPTH. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]