Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenACS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ArsDigita Community System. Orthogonal1, feel free to implement. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OpenACS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple issue tags since 2009 incl. NN since 2012 removed in de-PROD and reinserted in AFD. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Be..anyone (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 07:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 07:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: I'd say that this article should be merged into ArsDigita Community System, as OpenACS is simply a derivative of it and there's already a lot of overlap between the two articles. Orthogonal1 (talk) 10:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: to ArsDigita Community System per Orthogonal1 above - no RS sources to establish notability of this software. I note that the merge target article is also unreferenced, however.Dialectric (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a list of sources/information for possible expansion of the ArsDigita Community System. See User:Orthogonal1/sandbox Orthogonal1 (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you promise to turn those external links into proper references before they hit the article namespace we could close this debate as "merge to ArsDigita Community System" (wholesale, the logo is nice). –Be..anyone (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.