Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PewDiePie vs T-Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PewDiePie vs T-Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this even notable and important enough to warrant its own article. Maybe mention it as a section on both pages, but I don't think it should warrant its own page. Thenabster126 (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I fixed up the nomination; no opinion on its merits. ansh666 18:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep This article is very well references and you have provided no evidence why this should be deleted.  Nixinova  T  C  18:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - As per above, the article is well referenced and there is no given reason as for a deletion. Plus, this war is notable for just how far it's reached. It's gone from a inside joke within PewDiePie's fanbase to a somewhat legitimate far-reaching activism program that's taken seriously. AwesumIndustrys (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per above. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 19:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)![reply]
• Speedy keep per above - well-written, well-referenced article about one of the longest running and most notable events in internet culture's history. Buttons0603 (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per above. Cramero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramero (talk • contribs) 19:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per above, but a regular "keep" might have a stronger effect on staving off a possible merge proposal timesink. FWIW, this has got a lot of WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE and there are dozens of in-depth reliable sources over the span of multiple months. This is one of the biggest Internet memes ever and is comparable to many classic memes. wumbolo ^^^ 20:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion given. epicgenius (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.