User talk:W Nowicki: Difference between revisions

/Archive1 March 4, 2010 /Archive2 October 22, 2010 /Archive3 May 25, 2011 /Archive4 May 25, 2011 /Archive5 May 18, 2013 /Archive6 August 22, 2016

This editor has now been re-retired, so might be editing a bit again.

With reference to Washington Place article, I mentioned you and tried to ping you from wt:NRHP#Yikes: NPS replaced NRHP nom doc by later NHL nom doc. --doncram 02:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to thank you for your help with the Intertrust Technologies page. I was wondering if we can publish the page again, and if not, what needs to be done in order to publish it. Thanks, Arthurnoort (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just checking in on this again. Do you think you can publish the Intertrust Technologies page again sometime soon? Thanks, Arthurnoort (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - on your comment on the Talk:Kinetica (software) page you accidentally typed the opposite of what you meant. "I do not want to avoid an edit war, so need a third opinion here please." Timtempleton (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Egad, yes you are right! That should teach me to stop never using no double negatives - not. Thanks! W Nowicki (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, W Nowicki. I see you've made a couple small edits to the CTIA – The Wireless Association article -- thanks for those. I am wondering if you're planning to revisit the full edit request; so far, you're the only editor I've found who has responded. Are you still willing to review and implement this draft? If you're unavailable, I can try asking some WikiProject members for help. Thanks again! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, Please check the edits that you made to the page. I agree with the removal of the extra items from the infobox but removing a Mrs. title addressing a married lady is unreasonable & comical in true nature. Also please do some research because you just edited a person's name with his surname which may signify anyone from his family also which goes against the way wikipedia goes. Also the person in question has completed his Ph.D which confers him with the right to be addressed as Dr. Kanodia whereas the rest of his family have not done their Ph.d which is why making changes to his degree or questioning that is kind of hilarious. I agree with most of your edits but please do adequate research as it takes a lot to create these pages after thorough research and having no connection with the person with just interest in wikipedia we all are striving hard to make it more informative every second. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicrazy09 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am affiliated with Pure Storage. I proposed a draft that is less promotional and removes the awards section.

I saw that you edited in the past and was hoping you'd have a quick chance to take a look at the bottom of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pure_Storage

Ianwikramanayake (talk) 18:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technical details of Netflix, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical details of Netflix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kona Shuttle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kona Shuttle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HighKing⁺⁺ 10:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]