Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 26

< June 25	June 27 >

June 26[edit]

File:ChrKaufmannFührerbuch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy keep withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) House Blaster^talk 02:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image was dePROD'd because the Document’s author is 80 years old {{PD-old-80}} applies. I do not disagree. However, this is a 3D picture, and there is no evidence that the photograph (of the public domain book) is released under a free license. Because this photo depicts something 3D it does not qualify for {{PD-art}}. House Blaster^talk 00:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rutilio grande.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Probably non-free. No prejudice to restoration if someone can create a valid fair use claim for this image -FASTILY 05:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False license. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait of Rutilio Grande.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/retag While the license is VERY likely bogus, this image cannot be replaced as the subject is deceased. Change to NFCC and keep it. Buffs (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim lynagh.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Probably non-free. No prejudice to restoration if someone can create a valid fair use claim for this image -FASTILY 05:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader was born 1 year before the subject died halfway across the contient yet claims to be the author. Nonsense. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is the chance that the uploader lied about their age on the internet, but we should be careful. House Blaster^talk 03:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/retag While the license is VERY likely bogus, this image cannot be replaced as the subject is deceased. Change to NFCC and keep it. Buffs (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:British Mycological Society logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:British Mycological Society logo.svg and no longer used. Unsuitable for Commons as it is likely copyrighted in its country of origin. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no reason to keep duplicate files that are not needed for attribution purposes. House Blaster^talk 18:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. That's fine with me. Thank you for alerting me to this. Sorry I had not realised that there were two versions out there. Storye book (talk) 18:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This particular version of the SVG logo didn't actually exist until today. Although the BMS website did have a vector logo, I had to make some modifications to make it match the color used in the PNG file. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ixfd64. Your work on that file is much appreciated. Storye book (talk) 17:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Force10 (logo).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:Logo Force10.svg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete apparently the rules for trademarks have changed. At the time, we were only allowed low-resolution, but the vector version is better if we are allowed to keep that one. Thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@W Nowicki: I don't believe the rules have changed. We only use low-resolution versions for non-free files. This particular logo is in public domain because it does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KCTE ESPN1510AM-99.3FM logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:ESPN Kansas City logo.svg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.