User talk:24.211.136.174: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==SAT== |
==SAT== |
||
You do not simply get to revert to your version claiming "turn for the worse" and then abandon the discussion citing "not enough time to explain" and then insulting the person with whom you have been discussing. That is not how it works here. Either you continue explaining, even to those you consider to be stupider than yourself, and continue to move towards a consensus, or you leave the article in the hands of others. [[User:Maunus|·maunus]] · [[User talk:Maunus|snunɐɯ·]] 13:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC) |
You do not simply get to revert to your version claiming "turn for the worse" and then abandon the discussion citing "not enough time to explain" and then insulting the person with whom you have been discussing. That is not how it works here. Either you continue explaining, even to those you consider to be stupider than yourself, and continue to move towards a consensus, or you leave the article in the hands of others. [[User:Maunus|·maunus]] · [[User talk:Maunus|snunɐɯ·]] 13:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
: I am leaving it in your hands. Hence I am trying to get at the underlying problem. The underlying problem is not that you are stupider than me. It is simply that you are not as experienced, which is an easy fact to prove. Have you attended college where you had to write research papers in English to be graded and corrected? It is perfectly fine if you didn't, just remember that it puts you in a disadvantage when it comes to recognizing your own |
: I am leaving it in your hands. Hence I am trying to get at the underlying problem. The underlying problem is not that you are stupider than me. It is simply that you are not as experienced, which is an easy fact to prove. Have you attended college where you had to write research papers in English to be graded and corrected? It is perfectly fine if you didn't, just remember that it puts you in a disadvantage when it comes to recognizing your own . [[Special:Contributions/24.211.136.174|24.211.136.174]] ([[User talk:24.211.136.174#top|talk]]) 13:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:37, 11 September 2015
SAT
You do not simply get to revert to your version claiming "turn for the worse" and then abandon the discussion citing "not enough time to explain" and then insulting the person with whom you have been discussing. That is not how it works here. Either you continue explaining, even to those you consider to be stupider than yourself, and continue to move towards a consensus, or you leave the article in the hands of others. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- I am leaving it in your hands. Hence I am trying to get at the underlying problem. The underlying problem is not that you are stupider than me. It is simply that you are not as experienced, which is an easy fact to prove. Have you attended college where you had to write research papers in English to be graded and corrected? It is perfectly fine if you didn't, just remember that it puts you in a disadvantage when it comes to recognizing the flaws in your own writing. 24.211.136.174 (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)