User contributions for 24.211.136.174
Appearance
For 24.211.136.174 talk block log logs filter log
6 October 2015
- 12:1712:17, 6 October 2015 diff hist +14 Weizmann Institute of Science No edit summary
- 12:1512:15, 6 October 2015 diff hist 0 Weizmann Institute of Science →Details
- 08:1708:17, 6 October 2015 diff hist +20 Weizmann Institute of Science →Details
- 08:1208:12, 6 October 2015 diff hist +366 Weizmann Institute of Science →Details
26 September 2015
- 00:5200:52, 26 September 2015 diff hist −29 OK Computer →Reception: - too positive. one adjective is enough to get the point across
25 September 2015
- 20:0120:01, 25 September 2015 diff hist +17 Weizmann Institute of Science No edit summary
- 08:0708:07, 25 September 2015 diff hist −406 Hebrew University of Jerusalem →Rankings: - again getting rid of outdates survey
- 08:0608:06, 25 September 2015 diff hist +722 Hebrew University of Jerusalem →Rankings: - putting it back
- 08:0408:04, 25 September 2015 diff hist −128 Hebrew University of Jerusalem →Rankings: - IDEAS is not a reputable ranking (not in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_and_university_rankings)
- 08:0108:01, 25 September 2015 diff hist +14 Hebrew University of Jerusalem putting out of lead per Wikipedia:Avoid_academic_boosterism#Be_concise.2C_precise.2C_and_honest
- 07:5807:58, 25 September 2015 diff hist −723 Hebrew University of Jerusalem CWUR is not one of the three standard measures (unlike ARWU) and the lead shouldn't have it, see Wikipedia:College_and_university_article_guidelines#Neutral_point_of_view. the other survey is outdated - more recent versions since 2012 don't list HU.
21 September 2015
- 16:1616:16, 21 September 2015 diff hist −118 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill No edit summary
17 September 2015
- 02:5002:50, 17 September 2015 diff hist −44 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill →University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill academic-athletic scandal: - don't need the long first part
13 September 2015
- 12:2912:29, 13 September 2015 diff hist +13 SAT →Gender
- 12:2712:27, 13 September 2015 diff hist −38 SAT →Race and ethnicity: - putting sentence where it belongs
- 12:2312:23, 13 September 2015 diff hist −1 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 12:1912:19, 13 September 2015 diff hist −15 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 12:1812:18, 13 September 2015 diff hist 0 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 12:1812:18, 13 September 2015 diff hist +12 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 00:3300:33, 13 September 2015 diff hist +495 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 00:2900:29, 13 September 2015 diff hist −26 SAT →Race and ethnicity: - Putting information in different paragraphs. The information about predictive validity has little to do with the lack of bias in the scores themselves, which better serves as a prelude to the gap explanations.
11 September 2015
- 13:5813:58, 11 September 2015 diff hist +156 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:4913:49, 11 September 2015 diff hist +268 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:4413:44, 11 September 2015 diff hist +526 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:3913:39, 11 September 2015 diff hist −7 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:3713:37, 11 September 2015 diff hist +114 User talk:24.211.136.174 No edit summary
- 13:3713:37, 11 September 2015 diff hist +15 User talk:24.211.136.174 No edit summary
- 13:3413:34, 11 September 2015 diff hist +585 User talk:24.211.136.174 No edit summary
- 13:3113:31, 11 September 2015 diff hist +369 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:2813:28, 11 September 2015 diff hist +668 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:1213:12, 11 September 2015 diff hist −1,437 SAT rv turn for worst, conflating issues, erroneous inferences. see talk
- 13:1113:11, 11 September 2015 diff hist +87 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 13:1013:10, 11 September 2015 diff hist +1,358 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 12:0512:05, 11 September 2015 diff hist +59 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 12:0412:04, 11 September 2015 diff hist +669 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 11:3311:33, 11 September 2015 diff hist −878 SAT →Race and ethnicity: - see talk
- 11:3211:32, 11 September 2015 diff hist +1,089 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 11:1611:16, 11 September 2015 diff hist +536 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 09:2909:29, 11 September 2015 diff hist 0 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 09:2809:28, 11 September 2015 diff hist +19 SAT →Gender
- 09:2609:26, 11 September 2015 diff hist −854 SAT →Gender: - most of this section is based on OR and irrelevant info. The source says nothing about the putative explanation. Females having a higher college GPA is not paradoxical here - what might be paradoxical is how they do in their math classes
- 02:0902:09, 11 September 2015 diff hist +6 SAT →Correlations with student traits
- 02:0102:01, 11 September 2015 diff hist +5 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 01:5701:57, 11 September 2015 diff hist +3,148 Talk:SAT →Somebody who studied intelligence/developmental psychology, please fix awful race section
- 01:1901:19, 11 September 2015 diff hist −1,407 SAT Maunus, see talk page. I realize I probably compromised accuracy but the mistakes in your version are much more glaring and misinformative - no scholar would make absolutes like that. This is not the final version but it is clearly a step forward IMO.
10 September 2015
- 14:0414:04, 10 September 2015 diff hist 0 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 14:0314:03, 10 September 2015 diff hist −3 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 14:0014:00, 10 September 2015 diff hist −2 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 13:5713:57, 10 September 2015 diff hist −12 SAT →Race and ethnicity
- 13:5613:56, 10 September 2015 diff hist −30 SAT →Race and ethnicity