User contributions for 108.28.162.195

25 May 2014

• 22:3022:30, 25 May 2014 diff hist +1,499‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee ‎ →‎Online Privacy Protection Act of 2003 - California Business and Professions Code sections 22575-22579: Add my comment whether its wanted or not
• 15:0915:09, 25 May 2014 diff hist +667‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Ping admins
• 09:0109:01, 25 May 2014 diff hist +481‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Reply to Bushranger

24 May 2014

• 21:4421:44, 24 May 2014 diff hist +616‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Reply to Paul the Admin
• 21:3621:36, 24 May 2014 diff hist +38‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ also please assume good faith unless you have proof otherwise
• 21:3421:34, 24 May 2014 diff hist +347‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Comment to Paul Erik
• 21:3221:32, 24 May 2014 diff hist −60‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Fix
• 21:3021:30, 24 May 2014 diff hist +223‎ User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ Also
• 21:2621:26, 24 May 2014 diff hist +600‎ N User talk:108.28.162.195 ‎ REquest unblock
• 21:1821:18, 24 May 2014 diff hist +1,877‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee ‎ Undid revision 609991285 by Demiurge1000 (talk)Undo bad faith reversion. If you have some proof I am Kumioko then present it, otherwise leave my comments as they are please
• 20:5820:58, 24 May 2014 diff hist +1,876‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee ‎ →‎ArbCom needs to deny this: Reply to Liz
• 19:0619:06, 24 May 2014 diff hist +1,743‎ User talk:Newyorkbrad ‎ →‎Another perspective: add comment
• 18:1418:14, 24 May 2014 diff hist +487‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee ‎ →‎ArbCom needs to deny this: Reply to Coat of many colors
• 16:4116:41, 24 May 2014 diff hist +930‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee ‎ →‎ArbCom needs to deny this: Comment