Jump to content

User contributions for 173.56.203.56

For 173.56.203.56 talk block log logs filter log

13:0513:05, 24 September 2022 diff hist +11‎ Anal beads ‎ →‎See also Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

01:5501:55, 21 September 2022 diff hist −3‎ Bored Ape ‎ tweak Tag: Reverted
01:5501:55, 21 September 2022 diff hist +89‎ Bored Ape ‎ expand Tag: Reverted

01:1801:18, 14 June 2022 diff hist +909‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: Reply Tag: Reply
00:3900:39, 14 June 2022 diff hist +690‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ retort
00:3400:34, 14 June 2022 diff hist +265‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ clarify
00:2600:26, 14 June 2022 diff hist +612‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ reply

14:3114:31, 13 June 2022 diff hist +55‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section
14:3014:30, 13 June 2022 diff hist +493‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: reply
13:1513:15, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: minor c/e
13:1413:14, 13 June 2022 diff hist +761‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ Getting this discussion back on topic of the proposed changes
12:2212:22, 13 June 2022 diff hist +448‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: reply
12:1912:19, 13 June 2022 diff hist +179‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: edit: i see a new section has been created to discuss this with links , so perhaps best to discuss this there
12:0412:04, 13 June 2022 diff hist +146‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
12:0312:03, 13 June 2022 diff hist +370‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
12:0012:00, 13 June 2022 diff hist +31‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus
11:5911:59, 13 June 2022 diff hist +479‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: reply
11:3111:31, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: fix pings to a few others who i recall supporting inclusion of this material
11:2911:29, 13 June 2022 diff hist +986‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: developments
11:2111:21, 13 June 2022 diff hist +863‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: reply
04:4904:49, 13 June 2022 diff hist +15‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ →‎June 2022
04:4604:46, 13 June 2022 diff hist +197‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ add
04:4104:41, 13 June 2022 diff hist +29‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎No edit summary
04:4104:41, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1,119‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
02:2902:29, 13 June 2022 diff hist +132‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?
02:2702:27, 13 June 2022 diff hist +301‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: expand
02:2402:24, 13 June 2022 diff hist +932‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: Wholeheartedly agree
02:1502:15, 13 June 2022 diff hist +365‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ additionally
02:1202:12, 13 June 2022 diff hist +448‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
02:0902:09, 13 June 2022 diff hist +15,910‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ You have still not provided a policy basis for the removal of a referenced section content. Your citation of "Opinions are like arseholes" is not a justifiable reason to delete an entire section of content. These are statements made by reliable sources and you have not provided a policy basis to remove them Tags: Undo Reverted
01:2601:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist −2‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also
01:2601:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also
01:2601:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist +38‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also: add some wikilinks to some other informative pages on this topic
01:2001:20, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2,119‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ in the spirit of compromise i've restored the paragraph you added as well as an introduction to the restored section. However, I've added a sentence wholly consisting of direct quotations from the sources in addition to the previous material as I do not believe the previous characterization of the sources was apt Tag: Reverted
01:0601:06, 13 June 2022 diff hist +141‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
01:0501:05, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13,791‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ that's not how WP:ONUS works this was longstanding content in the article that was deleted without consensus or justification. You have also not provided any justification for deleting the content. Please join the discussion on the talk page if you wish to express your views. Tags: Undo Reverted
00:5200:52, 13 June 2022 diff hist +645‎ User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging ‎ →‎Greg Kaye: new section
00:4700:47, 13 June 2022 diff hist +833‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Someone please Topic Ban Greg Kaye: new section Tag: Reverted
00:3900:39, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13,791‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Reactions: Partially restored section for which there was neither consensus nor justification for deletion. Please do a better job of justifying why this should be deleted on the talk page, apart from saying "the media is biased" and that it "whips up controversy." This is the analysis found in reliable mainstream media sources; if you don't like it, take it up with the media. This is not the place to win your political cause, this is an encylopedia that reports what media/academy says. Tag: Reverted
00:2000:20, 13 June 2022 diff hist +41‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
00:1800:18, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
00:1700:17, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1,017‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?: reply

21:1821:18, 12 June 2022 diff hist +176‎ Free-to-play ‎ More important criticism and is mentioned in the article, belongs in the lead Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20:4520:45, 12 June 2022 diff hist +21‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: clarify
19:5819:58, 12 June 2022 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus
19:5719:57, 12 June 2022 diff hist +18‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
19:5619:56, 12 June 2022 diff hist +91‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: expand slightly
19:5219:52, 12 June 2022 diff hist −12‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
19:5119:51, 12 June 2022 diff hist +284‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
19:5019:50, 12 June 2022 diff hist +985‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: Are you serious? What is done in other articles is that editors don't edit the sources to make their quotations suit their political men's rights agendas because they t

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.56.203.56"