User contributions for 66.16.148.174
Appearance
For 66.16.148.174 talk block log logs filter log
9 January 2011
25 December 2010
- 11:3911:39, 25 December 2010 diff hist −1,005 Copyright infringement →"Theft" Tag: references removed
30 July 2009
- 21:4621:46, 30 July 2009 diff hist +1,013 Talk:Benny Hill No edit summary
6 June 2009
26 September 2007
- 18:4018:40, 26 September 2007 diff hist +1,185 Talk:Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom →Pictures of the accused criminals
7 June 2007
- 07:3207:32, 7 June 2007 diff hist −437 Domain name →Commercial resale of domain names: deleated dated 2004 and disproven for Business.com info - not to mention Altavista was needed for a trademark
- 07:2507:25, 7 June 2007 diff hist +314 Domain name →Commercial resale of domain names: Added info that 7.5 million sale of Business.com was for stock, not cash
25 April 2007
- 15:5615:56, 25 April 2007 diff hist +315 Web 2.0 →Criticism: added quote from book Cult of the Amateur - not sure if I did reference in wiki format
16 April 2007
- 17:0517:05, 16 April 2007 diff hist +368 Talk:SAT →R scores
13 April 2007
- 10:5610:56, 13 April 2007 diff hist +321 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 07:2107:21, 13 April 2007 diff hist +1,060 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 07:0607:06, 13 April 2007 diff hist +20 SAT →History, name changes and recentered scores: although still recentered the R stopped in 2001 see talk for link
- 06:2706:27, 13 April 2007 diff hist +1,433 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 06:0506:05, 13 April 2007 diff hist −371 SAT No edit summary
11 April 2007
- 21:1621:16, 11 April 2007 diff hist −161 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 21:0521:05, 11 April 2007 diff hist −1 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 21:0421:04, 11 April 2007 diff hist +950 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 19:4919:49, 11 April 2007 diff hist −50 SAT →Function: deleted The SATs are a bad idea The SAT's are for stupids - If you want to vandalize a popular wikipedia page, you have to insert believable half truths not BS
- 06:4506:45, 11 April 2007 diff hist +94 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 06:4306:43, 11 April 2007 diff hist +481 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 06:3606:36, 11 April 2007 diff hist −345 SAT No edit summary
10 April 2007
- 06:2206:22, 10 April 2007 diff hist +38 SAT →History and name changes: trying to explain recentering here - feel free to imporve - but the 20-30 point gap in 700s , as shown in Real SAT books exists and has nothing to do with recentering
- 00:0200:02, 10 April 2007 diff hist +116 Talk:SAT →R scores
9 April 2007
- 23:5623:56, 9 April 2007 diff hist +401 Talk:SAT →R scores
- 23:4723:47, 9 April 2007 diff hist −383 SAT the R for recentered is not important to 99% of test takers and should not be in introduction - One individual example and personal attack as absurd is not evidence
6 April 2007
- 04:3404:34, 6 April 2007 diff hist −383 SAT the R for recentered is not important to 99% of test takers and should not be in introduction - only important to a few who care about history of test
- 04:2704:27, 6 April 2007 diff hist −86 SAT →Structure: unless someone knows more - I don't think that a third essay grader has no knowledge of first scores or can can alone assign extreme score
11 March 2007
- 06:4006:40, 11 March 2007 diff hist +11 SAT →Raw scores, scaled scores and percentiles: online is free which most/all students use - only time over 3 weeks is Nov over Thanksgiving when ETS needs a few more work days
- 06:2506:25, 11 March 2007 diff hist −25 SAT →History and name changes: there is NO 2004 revision - 2004 was last year of some 1994 revision - deleted to avoid confusion
10 March 2007
- 07:0407:04, 10 March 2007 diff hist −608 SAT →Recycling of exam questions: EVERY single question on ALL SATs is seen before to normalize test - News Google SAT and see that ETS cancelled scores of 900 Korean students – Bad reporting by Fox
8 December 2006
- 22:4622:46, 8 December 2006 diff hist +73 SAT →Bias: this whole paragraph sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. SAT questions are pretested on nonscored experimental sections to normalize all tests. delete if no references?
17 November 2006
- 23:2823:28, 17 November 2006 diff hist +371 Domain name →Commercial resale of domain names: The $7.5 million is in dispute - if it's too long and complex for wikipedia, I suggest deleting entire discussion. Feel free to delete reference/links if not n
16 November 2006
- 06:2206:22, 16 November 2006 diff hist +91 Domain name →External links
13 November 2006
- 03:1703:17, 13 November 2006 diff hist +65 SAT →External links: should an advertisment with no information be here??? A free sample at bottom of page leads to an exe file from an unknown, untrustable source? Spam, worse??
11 November 2006
- 23:5623:56, 11 November 2006 diff hist +58 Social Security debate in the United States →Anti-privatization websites
- 00:0300:03, 11 November 2006 diff hist +576 SAT →SAT and Coaching and Preparation
10 November 2006
- 04:2904:29, 10 November 2006 diff hist +63 Social Security debate in the United States →Anti-privatization websites
9 November 2006
- 23:3523:35, 9 November 2006 diff hist +134 Vocabulary →External links
- 21:4221:42, 9 November 2006 diff hist +1,016 SAT →SAT and Coaching and Preparation
- 20:3820:38, 9 November 2006 diff hist −62 SAT →External links