User contributions for JamesRussels
A user with 310 edits. Account created on 2 May 2013.
2 June 2015
- 23:1823:18, 2 June 2015 diff hist +97 User talk:JamesRussels No edit summary
- 23:1823:18, 2 June 2015 diff hist +1,793 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
28 April 2015
- 23:5723:57, 28 April 2015 diff hist +11 m User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 23:5223:52, 28 April 2015 diff hist +30 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 23:4923:49, 28 April 2015 diff hist +2,685 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:5321:53, 28 April 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:5321:53, 28 April 2015 diff hist +53 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:5221:52, 28 April 2015 diff hist +56 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:5021:50, 28 April 2015 diff hist +4 m User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:4921:49, 28 April 2015 diff hist −4 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block'
- 21:4921:49, 28 April 2015 diff hist +3,114 User talk:JamesRussels →My 'indefinite block': new section
20 October 2014
- 13:1213:12, 20 October 2014 diff hist +461 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights →Part 2
- 13:0913:09, 20 October 2014 diff hist +45 Vistula–Oder offensive Reverted. Unreliable sources that have so many flaws in them like this one, and aren't even up to highschool standards as they don't provide references, don't belong on wikipedia. Either my primary source backed up by the reputable historians or nothing.
- 13:0513:05, 20 October 2014 diff hist +1,120 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
9 October 2014
- 17:3517:35, 9 October 2014 diff hist +566 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights →Soviet casualties again and Konev
- 17:3117:31, 9 October 2014 diff hist +45 Vistula–Oder offensive Oh but the "excuses" are already provided. You have no excuse for not providing a reason beyond "he's a historian". That does not make all his work up to standard, specially when it's confronted by things mentioned and not referenced again.
- 17:2917:29, 9 October 2014 diff hist +1,741 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
8 October 2014
- 19:3819:38, 8 October 2014 diff hist +45 Vistula–Oder offensive Claiming 2x the dead of the Sovinformburo and 3.5x more lost tanks than they had available during even Bagration in 1944? No nonsense edits without proving your case on the talkpage. Might as well edit my archival source again in then too.
- 19:3119:31, 8 October 2014 diff hist +21 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 19:3019:30, 8 October 2014 diff hist +211 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 19:2619:26, 8 October 2014 diff hist +134 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 19:2219:22, 8 October 2014 diff hist +619 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
1 October 2014
- 17:3417:34, 1 October 2014 diff hist +242 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights No edit summary
- 17:1617:16, 1 October 2014 diff hist +22 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 17:1517:15, 1 October 2014 diff hist +582 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 17:1317:13, 1 October 2014 diff hist +264 Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 →Production Number
28 September 2014
- 11:1511:15, 28 September 2014 diff hist +840 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 11:1011:10, 28 September 2014 diff hist +84 Vistula–Oder offensive Changed weasel wording edits you've made to make it sound like atrocities never happened or were just exaggerated because of "demonizing nazi propaganda" (doesn't sound very NPOV, Soviets also demonized the Germans).
- 11:0211:02, 28 September 2014 diff hist +230 Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 No edit summary
27 September 2014
- 15:0015:00, 27 September 2014 diff hist +5 m Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 →Production Number
- 15:0015:00, 27 September 2014 diff hist +605 Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 No edit summary
- 14:3614:36, 27 September 2014 diff hist +9 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 14:3514:35, 27 September 2014 diff hist +26 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive No edit summary
- 14:3314:33, 27 September 2014 diff hist 0 Battle of the Seelow Heights Ok then, but this is the figure said on p.468. The other is from a dead russian youtube video.
- 14:2914:29, 27 September 2014 diff hist +1,229 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights No edit summary
- 14:2114:21, 27 September 2014 diff hist +35 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 14:2014:20, 27 September 2014 diff hist +1,644 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive No edit summary
- 14:0114:01, 27 September 2014 diff hist +180 m Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 →Production Number
- 13:5913:59, 27 September 2014 diff hist +631 Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 No edit summary
25 September 2014
- 18:3618:36, 25 September 2014 diff hist +205 m Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights No edit summary
- 18:3218:32, 25 September 2014 diff hist +196 Vistula–Oder offensive Actually, it isn't the only thing I provided. But obviously you being unable to defend yourself with arguments on the talkpage I am not surprised you say that.
- 18:3118:31, 25 September 2014 diff hist +187 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 18:2818:28, 25 September 2014 diff hist +38 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 18:2618:26, 25 September 2014 diff hist +138 m Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive No edit summary
- 18:2218:22, 25 September 2014 diff hist +3,582 Talk:Vistula–Oder offensive →Third opinion
- 17:5417:54, 25 September 2014 diff hist +160 Battle of the Seelow Heights Source is unquestionable (see professional historians acceptal), just incomplete regarding SS losses and possibly (but possibly not) for regular army. Reverted.
- 17:4917:49, 25 September 2014 diff hist +1,177 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights →Part 2
- 17:4217:42, 25 September 2014 diff hist +46 m Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 →Production Number
- 17:4117:41, 25 September 2014 diff hist +377 Talk:7.5 cm Pak 40 →Production Number
23 September 2014
- 20:4620:46, 23 September 2014 diff hist +150 Talk:Battle of the Seelow Heights No edit summary
