Jump to content

Talk:Alien Spidy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox and image

[edit]

@Sven Manguard: I'm aware that you don't like utilizing copyrighted images (although I think it's unlikely that this game will pass GAN without any), but is there a reason there's no infobox? Tezero (talk) 23:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that they are particularly useful in situations where everything that would be in the infobox is also in the lead, but I have added one anyways. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
...and now there's an image. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

[edit]

I'd kill PS3 and PC from the GameRankings section of {{vg reviews}}. It isn't an aggregate view if there are only one or two reviews calculated. czar  12:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it down to the notes section, putting it in additional context. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Alien Spidy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing... Secret account 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

No close paraphrasing concerns, prose is fine, sources are reliable and matches the information. Passing. Secret account 19:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]