Jump to content

Talk:Bomba Patch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk11:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bomba Patch logo
Bomba Patch logo
  • ... that video game mod Bomba Patch's name (logo pictured) was taken from éclairs? Source: [1] "[...] the tournament's grand prize was a chocolate éclair [nominator's note: Chocolate éclairs are known as "bombas de chocolate" in Brazil] [...] In the following editions, he invested in other more modern prizes, such as a Discman, but the name that was already on people's lips was the Bomba Cup - which ended up being the origin of the name Bomba Patch."
    • ALT1: ... that video game mod Bomba Patch's theme song (logo pictured) was inspired by a priest? Source: [2] Allan began to think of a song to rock the mod's success. That's when he remembered the song that the town priest had played on the sound system (...) The verses inspired Allan who, together with a group specializing in political jingles, composed the funk that would become one of the most iconic songs in the Brazilian gamer scene.
    • Reviewed: (less than 5 credits)

Created by Skyshifter (talk). Self-nominated at 20:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bomba Patch; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bomba Patch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Comments to follow soon. ♦ jaguar 18:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few prose issues, but I'll leave this on hold and will review it again once all of the above have been clarified. jaguar 19:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: thank you for reviewing the article! I've responded to everything so far. Indeed I am not very good with prose, but hopefully everything can be sorted out by the end of the review. I can also help clarify some Portuguese sources if needed. Skyshifter talk 00:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Skyshifter. I made a couple of copyedits but this looks good to go now. Well done! jaguar 23:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]