Jump to content

Talk:Hope (programming language)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Later versions

[edit]

The lazy versions (of which the first was the ICL/Imperial College version Hope+, I believe) had many more changes than just laziness. Real (floating point) arithmetic, array types, annotations to force argument evaluation before demand despite the laziness, and more (I can't remember what else - for example I seem to remember we changed the pattern matching rules, but don't recall exactly how). Michealt (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Stream Programming Language, Also Called Hope

[edit]

Some article (source amnesia, sorry) described a stream programming language named Hope. Arguments were always streams of values. A literal denoted a stream of the same value infinitely repeated. For example, the language construct "3" denoted a stream 3, 3, 3, 3, . . . . The "+" operator meant the operation that took two streams and produced a result stream by adding corresponding elements of the input streams. There were also built-in operators that would have a memory effect, where the calculation of an element of the result stream might depend partly on elements at earlier indices in the input streams. I'm sure I saw the article in 1981 or later (maybe closer to 1990). It could have been in ACM Sigplan Notices. Jack Waugh (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing PROD

[edit]

A simple WP:BEFORE style search revealed in a couple of minutes tutorial in Byte, an entire book on the subject and discussion of the language in a history of functional programming languages. This language looks probably notable to me, so I am removing the PROD. --Mark viking (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this language is of historical importance: it introduced algebraic data types. —Ruud 11:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, a good historical step it was, and deserves an article. SaundersLane (talkcontribs) 15:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hope (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]