Jump to content

Talk:Ogdoad (Egyptian)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs Edit

[edit]

Where it discussed the flags and axes, the sentence structure seems broken and as if it needs editing. Very sloppy appearance because the symbols are added by text in quotation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armorbeast (talkcontribs) 07:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Armorbeast: Thanks. The whole sentence was an outdated interpretation anyway, so I simply excised it. A. Parrot (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Ogdoad as a formula and hieroglyphic explanation for reproduction

[edit]

I wanted to discuss the proposal for the following explanation for Thoth's explanation of the Ogdoad:

I do expect it to be somewhat "controversial" indeed, though: It is a formula for how two people can breed, even in the situation where no physical sex is involved. It does allow for both our traditional biological explanations, but in fact, I believe it focuses almost entirely on the "spiritual" means of reproducing. Yes. However, in this case it provides with it a far more scientific, logical, even computational means of proving itself. I expect that if we are all patient with each other, then Wikipedia can provide a good place to discuss the issue. I need to find a good place to present this work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6430:4EC0:F147:7DF6:AC9:576F (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm afraid that place isn't here. Please see "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought", a subsection of the Wikipedia policy page on What Wikipedia is not. A. Parrot (talk) 23:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]