Talk:Skytrax/Archives/2013

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Any mention of Skytrax should definitely mention the Advertising Standards Authority investigation into Skytrax – it is a definitive, legal, reliable source. The ASA is the self-regulatory organisation (SRO) which regulate the content of advertisements, sales promotions and direct marketing in the UK. However Skytrax themselves appear to be regularly removing this reference from this wiki entry, within hours of it appearing. Can we stop Skytrax from editing their own entry? Newssexy (talk) 00:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

The article does mention the ASA rulings. It is indeed a regulatory agency and its findings are notable. However we don't need to go into a great deal of detail. The points that the ASA ruled on are noted and the detail can be found in the actual ruling which is referenced. Be very careful about accusing people of editing on behalf of the company without proof. I don't see any evidence of this happening. Editors are merely trying to be careful about maintaining a neutral point of view and not giving undue weight to criticisms as well as ensuring that any criticisms are reliably sourced and not just someone's opinion on a blog. Harry the Dog WOOF 07:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Serious vandalism from ip address 188.249.148.108 Messing with airlines ranking and replaced entire 5 star airline section contents with Emirates. Protect the page maybe? I have not reverted the vandalism as i am currently on phone Orangewarning (talk) 07:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)