Talk:Tesla Model S
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tesla Model S article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 7 June 2022 by ElijahPepe. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
|
Sales by country
[edit]The table under the Sales by Country section has percentages for each country of the total worldwide sales...They're all wrong. I don't know how they were calculated but they all appear to be wrong. Someone with more time than me will have to sort that (I'm semi-retired). Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 13:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not only that, it hasn't been updated since 2018 or something and the electric car landscape has changed vastly in the meanwhile. Somewhere in the article it says that the Model S is the second best selling electric car when in fact the Model 3 and Y have eclipsed it long ago. dllu (t,c) 07:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you have references, then you are more than welcome to update them yourself. Ask for help if you need it. Stepho talk 06:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- For example, here are the sales figures for the third quarter: [1] and it is straightforward to find the figures for every quarter prior to then. Since I work at Tesla, I have a conflict of interest so I will abstain from editing the article directly; however, in the upcoming days, if I have time, I can write some draft sections and suggest them with
{{request edit}}
. dllu (t,c) 22:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- For example, here are the sales figures for the third quarter: [1] and it is straightforward to find the figures for every quarter prior to then. Since I work at Tesla, I have a conflict of interest so I will abstain from editing the article directly; however, in the upcoming days, if I have time, I can write some draft sections and suggest them with
- If you have references, then you are more than welcome to update them yourself. Ask for help if you need it. Stepho talk 06:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Body conversions
[edit]There are three shooting brake conversions commercially available, should these be mentioned? Wiki pages for other car models sometimes includes this. 2A01:799:952:4500:E84E:8E6D:88E3:65AA (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- It is rare for us to mention custom (ie non-factory) modifications on any car article. If we did, each article would have a near-endless list of modifications possible to the body, engine, brakes, suspension, etc. The particular modifications are often limited in geographical location and the time period they are offered for, so they are of limited use to the majority of readers. So we restrict ourselves to factory offerings. Stepho talk 11:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Version section needs a rework
[edit]The version section is an absolute mess. Some versions get a long text, some don't, some references are made to models that aren't describbed ("The 70D replaced the 60, 60D, and P85", with no 60D ever mentioned), one of the images mentions a P85+, which isn't talked about anywhere... I suggest that the section is replaced by a table like this (values are from https://blog.clutch.ca/posts/understanding-the-different-tesla-model-s-versions , to be checked before the table is added, maybe data from ev-database.org ):
Version | Build period | motor specification | range | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
40 | 2013-2013 | Back 235hp and 317lb-ft | 224km (NRCAN) | Very small production run |
60 | 2013-2019 | Back 302hp and 317lb-ft | 335km (NRCAN) | motor updated to 315hp in 2015 |
85 | 2013-2016 | Back 362hp and 325lb-ft | 426km (NRCAN) | motor updated to 380hp in 2015 |
Performace (85) | 2013-2014 | Back 416hp and 443lb-ft | 426km (NRCAN) | motor updated to 380hp in 2015, its that the P85+? |
90 | 2015-2016 | Back 362hp and 325lb-ft | 426km (NRCAN) | First with option for AutoPilot |
70D | 2015-2016 | Back 328p and ???lb-ft, front ?? | 386km (NRCAN) | First AWD version |
85D | 2015-2016 | Back 376hp and ???lb-ft | 435km (NRCAN) | |
P85D | 2015-2016 | Combined 691hp and ???lb-ft | 407km (NRCAN) | |
P90D | 2015-2017 | Combined 691hp and ???lb-ft | 426km (NRCAN) | range up to 435km in 2016+ models |
Facelift from black nose cone to the new body coloured facia | ||||
70 | 2016-2016 | Back 315hp and 325lb-ft | 377km (NRCAN) | |
75 | 2016-2018 | Back 315hp and 325lb-ft | 401km (NRCAN) | |
60D | 2016-2017 | Combined 328hp and 387lb-ft | 351km (NRCAN) | |
75D | 2016-2017 | Combined 328hp and 387lb-ft | 417km (NRCAN) | |
90D | 2016-2017 | Combined 417hp and 485lb-ft | 473km (NRCAN) | |
P100D | 2016-2019 | Combined 503hp and ???lb-ft | 507km (NRCAN) | |
100D | 2017-2019 | Combined ???hp and ???lb-ft | 539km (NRCAN) | |
Abbandon of (P)kWh(D) naming scheme | ||||
Standard Range | 2019-2019 | Front 382hp and back 260hp | 459km (NRCAN) | Replaced 60D and 75D |
Long Range | 2019-2021 | Combined 541hp | 595km (NRCAN) | Replaced 100D, range up to 600km in 2020 |
Performance | 2019-2021 | Combined ???hp | 555km (NRCAN) | Replace the P100D, "Raven" drivetrain |
Long Range Plus | 2020-2021 | Combined 541hp | 629km (NRCAN) | "Raven" drivetrain |
Plaid | 2021- | Combined 1020hp | 630km (NRCAN) | First Tri-motor version |
S | 2022- | Combined 670hp | 652km (NRCAN) | "Palladium" |
With a break at the facia redesign.
NilsTillander (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your scheme looks fine in general. Thinking about international readers and readers not well versed in car stuff, some details to change are:
- What does "NRCAN" mean? A link would be good.
- Values and symbols should have a space between them - see WP:CARUNITS and WP:UNITS.
- Those "hp" and "lb-ft" look suspiciously like power and torque figures but in ancient units used by our grandfathers - see WP:CARUNITS and WP:UNITS.
- "??" values should be left blank.
- "Abbandon of (P)kWh(D) naming scheme", misspelling of "abandon". Perhaps replace with "After (P)xx(D) naming scheme abandoned".
- Are those calendar years or model years? Non-Americans mostly use calendar years and do not understand US style model years. Americans assume model years unless told different.
- But these are minor things that can be tweaked. Stepho talk 00:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)