Jump to content

Talk:Tijuana Flats/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 17:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead is way too short and needs to adequately summarize the whole artictle
 Done It's still pretty short, but then so is the whole article. CorporateM (Talk) 18:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please renominate the article when all the problems have been fixed JayJayWhat did I do? 18:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article is way to short and needs to be expanded, also it goes into unnecessary details like "As of 2008, the average check was $8 at lunch and $13 at dinner." I don't really need to know that and it doesn't have anything to with the restaurant really.
 Done It's still short, but it's a small chain (a personal favorite of mine) and I wouldn't expect it to be possible to expand it much more. CorporateM (Talk) 21:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    The articles tone makes it seem like it is the best restaurant ever like for example "After a school shooting in Newton, Connecticut, Tijuana Flats called December 27 Teacher Hero Day and gave teachers a free entree" that's great and all but not really needed
Hmm... not sure there is anything I can do about that. They are active in charitable efforts and those charities are documented in secondary sources. But it is trimmed a little now. CorporateM (Talk) 19:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  3. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article needs alot of work before it can be come a Good Article