Jump to content

Talk:Tory Lane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additional photos

[edit]

There are an additional two free-licensed photographs of this actress at Image:Tory Lane, LA party 1.JPG and Image:Tory Lane, LA party 2.JPG. If any feel they'd serve as a main image better than the current choice, feel free to replace. They're just there in case of a sudden expansion of the article. GeeJo (t)(c) • 14:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@Guy1890, re: [1], Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Reliable_for_filmographies.2C_not_biographies lists IAFD as unreliable for biographic data czar 04:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't actually say that at all. What it does say is that IAFD "Sometimes has a better biography, usually has a better film list. ... Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." IAFD has been used in Wikipedia articles like this one countless numbers of times for basic biographic data and reliable adult filmography information. Guy1890 (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." If there is consensus that the site is reliable for biographic data (fact-checking process, reputation for editorial quality, etc.), then it's time to change that sentence. If there is no consensus, then it is not a reliable source. czar 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tory Lane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]