Jump to content

Talk:X-Men 2099

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Unless there's a major requirement for a sweeping synopsis of the book, it's probably okay to remove the Stub classification, wouldn't you think? Control 20:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is no longer a stub. Nice work! android79 21:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:X-men2099-25.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:X-men2099-25.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:X-men2099-25.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on X-Men 2099. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cerebra has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Cerebra until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]