Jump to content

Template talk:Burger King

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Is there a reason why external links are placed directly in the template? I'm not going to jump the gun and just remove them, but I'm not sure they should be there. Protonk (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes

[edit]

User:Spshu recently made several changes to this template that I disagreed with. I reverted them with a rather poor explanation of simply "RV - Undo". Spshu undid my changes and reverted them a gain with a more descriptive reason for my revert, and was reverted again. I am asking that he revert his changes and discuss this here. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 01:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out on my talk page regarding the intergration of the above group item with the section/group headers: They are duplicate of the group titles. If some one can not understand as the section titles then they will not understand them in the "above" section. So, some how they are no longer about Burger King or McDonald. Basic common sense and is routinely used when possible on all navboxes. This keeps them more compact, makes the section headers more useful and keeps related links together. Spshu (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
yes, the current version is much better and more compact. also, can we remove the excessive styling and use the defaults? this would better match the format used by other navboxes, like Template:McDonald's. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]