User:Pikazilla/User Talk pg1

Thank you for experimenting with the page Arlong Pirates on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Heligoland 11:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the many contributions you've made to the wikipedia. while your obvious efforts to contribute information have been appreciated, i'd like to point out a policy wikipedia has against original research and citing your sources. While I understand that contributing to articles that deal with fiction can make this difficult, often times if you add something that hasn't been mentioned yet and it only appears in say, one episode or an anime, you can avoid people deleting your work as nonsense by citing the episode's name, and hopefully the number. This would have made your contributions to Poke Ball and Waddle Dee more encyclopaedic. Also, anything that you need to add "probably" to is speculation, take a look at what wiki is not, specifically, that wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. If it's your own opinion (or even if it's the opinion of a large majority of people at a fansite forum, like serbii forums), without a reliable source it shouldn't be included. For fiction this would include news articles about the subject, the books/games/anime themselves (properly noted - take a close look at Poke ball and note how episodes are mentioned when referring to the anime), and reputable fansites that are not prone to errors regarding what you're citing (as far as pokemon go, serebii is reputable for episode guides, but psypokes has a better history when it comes to the pokedex info). Also take a quick look at writing about fiction, it's something that even the most die-hard wikipedians can sometimes forget to follow. If u have any q's feel free to leave me a msg on my talk. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 12:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the edits to the Waddle Dee page: if you'll look more closely, you'll see that I didn't delete your information—instead, I cleaned it up a bit to make the page more professional-looking. I've reverted your change because of this. FredMSloniker 19:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't calling it satanism... that's merely the source's opinion - which I very much disagree with... you should perhaps take a closer look at the discussions before you assume points of view about complete strangers. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 19:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

MYBADPikazilla 10:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

All those characters you wrote crew thingys on like Kuro and Krieg... Its covered already on either their crew page or character page. So I removed them. Please don't repeat info. Once is enough. Angel Emfrbl 21:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm shocked that you seem unable to retain some maturity on Wikipedia... On the talk page of the Devil Fruit page and here with messing about with my note. While the first is nothing I can't delete, the latter is vandalism. You are allowed to deleted the comment, which if you disagreed with you should have done.

All I ask is you stop opening discussions on wikipedia pages, we can't discuss whether Mihawk had a DF sword... Nor can we add that comment to the page (wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic facts about stuff this is speculations) in way or form. Can you understand this Pikazilla, you seem incapable of understanding something so simple. I'm not complaining, just asking that you stop please. Reread what Wikipedia is and isn't at least. Angel Emfrbl 00:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Look, I try to help the onepiece on this website and you're in the way. I try to help the onepiece on Onepiece.Wikia and you're STILL in the way. I just want to help give information to the onepiece fans that don't know crap, and crap is what you're giving me!! Only edit something that I write that is not true in any way.

You can have links to these images from your userpage, but you cannot display the images themselves. My understanding is that adding the copyright symbol is not enough. ~ BigrTex 21:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh....Pikazilla 10:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Free images on the other hand can be on your user page. If there is a picture of any of the subjects that is marked as Public Domain, GFDL (Gnu free document(?) license), etc. you can use those on your User page. My understanding is that all images on Commons are fair game for User pages too.

The Free Fair Use images are ones that Wikipedia stores for use on articles about those things - the CD image of the Red Hot Chili Peppers is okay on an article about the CD. It may also be okay in an article about the Red Hot Chili Peppers that discusses aspects of that particular CD, but even that is a gray area. It likely would not be okay in an article about the top albums of the year. It definately is not okay on a User page. I'm not a legal expert, and all of the gray areas I leave to the legal experts. ~ BigrTex 14:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I am so confused, but I'll do my best, just tell me what to do if I screw up again (I might put your name on my website!!).

Perhaps without the typo, it will make more sense. There are a lot of images on Wikipedia. Anything that has a copyright by someone is only here if it falls under Fair Use because we use them to illustrate the subject of the image. The rest are here with their copyrights released through one of many licensing setups. If you go to the image page and there is a red copyright symbol, then it is not okay for your user page. I'm not sure if this makes things any clearer or not, but I hope it helps at least some. ~ BigrTex 19:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

YEAH!!![[1]]

Have you actually seen the art for that depicted a sphinxlike enemy?--Marhawkman 16:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC) yeah, and he's oviously a boss, so he's huge.

Do you have a link? I can't seem to find it.--Marhawkman 10:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The only pic I could find had no sense of scale at all.... For all I know it could be a battle arena.--Marhawkman 10:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Just wait...Pikazilla 19:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how to quantify your recent edit on the MP8 talk page. A) you shouldn't be editing other people's comments on the talk page, but there's this exception that people aren't supposed to be talking about things unrelated to the article, so it would be okay but B) you removed comments to a question you asked yourself that was inappropriate. So either the whole thread should go, or it should stay. Care to justify your actions? McKay 22:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

A)It was stupid B) My question was stupid C) They were stupid D)YRS

A is why you removed it, Why didn't you remove your question too as per B, and what does "YRS" mean? McKay 06:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

You R Stupid

Please stop your Personal Attacks and remain CIVIL, such comments don't belong on this encyclopedia. McKay 22:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to User talk:Pikazilla. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. McKay 19:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, as you did to User talk:Pikazilla, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McKay 16:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you blank a page, as you did to User talk:Pikazilla, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McKay 23:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pikazilla. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Dancing Banana.gif) was found at the following location: User:Pikazilla. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pikazilla. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Fguy vol1.png) was found at the following location: User:Pikazilla. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pikazilla. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Millenium Godzilla.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Pikazilla. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Pikazilla. Please do not use the godzilla image (Image:Millenium Godzilla.jpg) in your userspace. If you have any questions further about copyright or how images can be used in wikipedia, please ask. McKay 20:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Pikazilla, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Zilla.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Pikazilla/Userboxes/NoGino. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Godzilla wiki.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Congrats on finding a Godzilla image for your template that is appropriate for a user page! McKay 20:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Finaly, someone realises I have potential.Pikazilla 14:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:TurnToCandy.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi.

Angry Sun is being really annyoing on the Godzillasaurus article. I need some support in the discussion section. He thinks that in Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla II, Rodan was the parasite, and not Godzilla Junior, despite what the characters say on both English and Japanese versions. I've shown him pics, video clips and opinions from a kaiju forum which prove I'm right. All he does on the other hand is act all whiney and rude. I thought you could help out.83.100.132.71 20:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Rodan a parasite?! Parasites are small and skinny bugs that eats the insides of animals. Rodan is a pteradon.

Thank you for uploading Image:425 G.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Blue Harvest (Family Guy), you will be blocked from editing. Liempt 10:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

What are you talking about?

it needs some actual references, since it's been challenged. Please see what you can do. 05:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading Image:Friday13th3 tn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

What are you talking about?Pikazilla 20:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for the revert, I thought the text "Make love not warcraft" was just some random text added, not an actual link to another project page. Nn123645 00:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Makes sense.Pikazilla 09:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Vice cream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Category:Pollution in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

An editor has nominated Francis Griffin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Griffin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Jango Fett. For example, if you corrected a spelling mistake, noticed something wrong with the format, added a section to the article, or voiced your opinion in a discussion, please tell us in the space provided. It makes all our jobs much easier. Thank you. Grey Maiden ^talk 17:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chaosroid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Chub Chubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading Image:Dustbowlmap.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

So your contribution to the Casey Jones article was to remove some spacingsbetween words in theintroductory paragraph? Odd. 206.255.99.165 (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as You got rick roll'd, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Twinzor (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as You got rick roll'd, you will be blocked from editing. Honestly, you have been around here long enough that you should know better. Trusilver 23:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Modification of the Sun's properties, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Booglamay (talk) 23:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)