User talk:5a5ha seven/Archive 50

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: [[Draft:Genocide in 20th century draft|Genocide in 20th century draft](January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Genocides in history instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is possible that the Genocides in history article should be split, because it is very long, but please gain a consensus at Talk:Genocides in history that this is an appropriate draft of a split article before any resubmission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genocide in 20th century draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Genocide in 20th century draft, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 5a5ha seven! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasan Abbasifar (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hasan Abbasifar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hasan Abbasifar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium aceticum has been accepted

Clostridium aceticum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion reconsideration for L.A. Podcast

Hello! Thank you for pointing out the deficiencies of the article I created, L.A. Podcast. You were quite right that it was too short, and after seeing your speedy deletion nomination, I added much more information to the article, including news media references that credibly demonstrate the subject's importance and significance. Would you please reconsider the speedy deletion tag? Thanks again for helping a newbie out here. Perborate85 (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Perborate85: I still feel like you need to address the notability more. Although I don't believe the speedy deletion tag should be removed at this point, you could move it into draft-space, in which A7 does not apply. There you can remove the tag. 5a5ha seven (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@5a5ha seven:OK, got it! I'll keep trying.Perborate85 (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Perborate85: Should I move it into draft-space? 5a5ha seven (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: El Practicón (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Practicón and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:El Practicón, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

John J. Ensminger

Hello! Just a friendly note that the CSD tags you placed on John J. Ensminger were not correct. Have a look at the page history. It had been blanked by the page author, which is not a reason for deletion if others have restored it. Thanks. Possibly (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CJPE has been accepted

CJPE, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Redirect removed from your user page

I have removed the redirect from your user page to project space. If you like, you may add a link to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), but do not redirect the page there. Doing so violates the guideline on user pages. Please see Wikipedia:User pages for more information. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando González Molina has been accepted

Fernando González Molina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of settlements in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina/B, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batin, Bila and Bijela. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Undoing my articles on cartoons?

Hi, My articles on oswald cartoons keep getting rolledback to redirects. these redirects lead to useless charts on a list of disney animated shorts. I would just like an explanation from this. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.243.227 (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi @68.162.243.227:, could you please clarify which edit you are referring to? 5a5ha seven (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night: Edwards vs. Chimaev

Hi, Pls do not change the event name until it is shown on the UFC.com event page. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 22:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium arcticum has been accepted

Clostridium arcticum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium acidurici has been accepted

Clostridium acidurici, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium aminovalericum has been accepted

Clostridium aminovalericum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium aurantibutyricum has been accepted

Clostridium aurantibutyricum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium bartlettii has been accepted

Clostridium bartlettii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mario Jump 83! 04:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clostridium bryantii has been accepted

Clostridium bryantii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mario Jump 83! 01:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,165	The Internationale (talk)	Add sources
735	Hard science fiction (talk)	Add sources
18	Qualified New York political parties (talk)	Add sources
280	Jonathan Archer (talk)	Add sources
34	Klingon High Council (talk)	Add sources
739	Lungfish (talk)	Add sources
31	Clostridiaceae (talk)	Cleanup
490	Clostridium (talk)	Cleanup
20	Nonagonal number (talk)	Cleanup
47	Demon (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)	Expand
57	Doctor's Orders (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)	Expand
71	Harbinger (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)	Expand
37	The Expanse (Star Trek: Enterprise episode) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
67	The Catwalk (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
73	Klingon culture (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,321	Nissan Navara (talk)	Merge
1,645	Honda Fit (talk)	Merge
2	1995 World Allround Speed Skating Championships (talk)	Merge
46	Tattoo (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)	Wikify
45	Diffie–Hellman problem (talk)	Wikify
166	Trekkie (talk)	Wikify
15	Anglican Diocese of Ogbia (talk)	Orphan
2	Nanos Fireworks (talk)	Orphan
9	Mooreeffoc (talk)	Orphan
1,833	Cockapoo (talk)	Stub
9	Marvin V. Rush (talk)	Stub
34	The Voyager Conspiracy (talk)	Stub
59	Dennis McCarthy (composer) (talk)	Stub
20	Qabus-Nama (talk)	Stub
8	Robert Blackman (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1009444685

Hello, could you please explain this edit? It seems to have hidden one of the rcats. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry! I've corrected that. 5a5ha seven (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:05, 13 March 2021

Thanks, btu why was there a need to reorder the templates in the first place? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't remember why I did that edit.5a5ha seven (talk | contribs) 15:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Higgins

My page on Higgins has nothing to do with creation. He invented the first "credit card". Completely different topic. He is not well known, but is worth mentioning. I'll add a ref in April. TheeFactChecker (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your move

I will not link to it here, to prevent further disruption, but why did you think you were going to succeed moving a page that Page Movers, Admins, and Sysadmins had all failed to move? In fact your actions have only made the situation worse. Do not under any circumstances attempt any further moves. Not impressed. Polyamorph (talk) 04:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)