User talk:Braydwilde

Welcome!

Hello, Braydwilde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Aplomado ^talk 04:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making up leagues. bob rulz 02:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NPOV and WP:NOR on why we don't accept articles like this one. If you want you can move it to your user page though. ~ trialsanderrors 21:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on those two items above, I have nominated the article for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know, the article was deleted but has been archived to User:Braydwilde/Braydon Wilde's favorite Super Bowl moments if you'd like it for yourself or for a different website. Do NOT use it to repost the content in an article, though. —Mets501 (talk) 01:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to be a hoax, and so I have marked it with a prod tag. Can you provide any sources proving that this movie is indeed under production? -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page such as American Dragon: Jake Long: The Movie, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Dragon: Jake Long: The Movie[edit]

AfD discussion result was to speedily delete yesterday!  (aeropagitica)   (talk) 

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by vandalism and reposting previously deleted hoax articles. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  21:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Cars 1.5 sounds extremely supicious. Please cite a credible 3rd party source that you are creating a movie for Pixar. I also removed the reference to Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) in trivia. It was copied from another site that you contribute to, and I can find no references to how you are connected to anyone in the film. Turlo Lomon 06:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2007 Candystand Extreme Air Hockey World Cup, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 02:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for removing deletion tags. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-FisherQueen (Talk) 02:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Braydwilde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do NOT want to be blocked EVER. I like editing Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

That does not address your penchant for writing hoax/non-notable articles or disrutively remove deletion tags. --  Netsnipe  ►  03:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kevin Garnett, you will be blocked from editing. Pats Sox Princess 02:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kevin Garnett, you will be blocked from editing. Pats Sox Princess 02:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 2007 Nintendo All-Star Game, by Sasha Callahan (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 2007 Nintendo All-Star Game seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 2007 Nintendo All-Star Game, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 02:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]