Jump to content

User talk:Exodio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconSpace Colonization
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Space Colonization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Space Colonization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.


Bypass CNR

[edit]

Hi, sorry for not being more clear. CNR means "cross-namespace redirect." The page Wikipedia:Wikiportal/box-header (in the Wikipedia: namespace) is actually a redirect to Portal:Box-header (in the Portal: namespace). Sometimes CNRs aren't a huge problem, but in this case there were many instances of the same situation, so I decided to fix them. Ardric47 19:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great - thanks for the correction and the explanation. i am going to be doing a bunch of work the next couple months and i am still learning the ropes. i copied the code from another page, so i will probably go back and try to correct any other problems like that. Appreciate the feedback. --Exodio 02:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Sides of the Astronomy/Space Debate

[edit]

A Work in Progress

  • The two sides of the argument: Astronomy is the logical Portal and entrance into anything regarding space. Space is the logical entrance.

your vote on state routes poll?

[edit]

Hi, could you verify if this IP vote [1] on the State route naming convention poll was really you? Thanks, Fut.Perf. 19:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I would not have figured that out, of adding the link at the bottom. Thanks, CarpD 8/27/06

Completed the Catagory

[edit]

I made a catagory based on different levels of objects in the universe. It should allow classification to include anything in the universe. From Galaxies, Asteroids, to Cosmic Dust and beyond. Thanks, CarpD (^_^) 8/28/06 morning...

Astronomical objects project page

[edit]

Exodio,

I said it looks ugly because of the way the boxes overlap and collide on my Mozilla browser. In IE its not quite so bad, but what I like to think of as the introduction box (with the pleiades image) is pushed way down to a later part of the page. It really looks quite unappealing in the current arrangement, whereas the older version worked well with both browsers and in any browser width. Sorry. — RJH (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I think the boxes might be a bit much, since i've been looking at it. I think if i take out the boxes for the first couple sections that do not change, that might help out. I will try to get to that tonight or tomorrow. Thanks for the feedback and sorry about the hassle - i want to give all the Space type pages a similiar feel and was basing the project pages off the Portal pages. It's good to get the feedback so the majority ends up liking. Cheers

Great, thank you for the attention you've spent on the formatting. — RJH (talk) 13:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool job that, Kudos!... wondering why is subpage and not in template space. If there are other sister projects (?Wikisource?) where is used, there are link-tagging-templates available for all sister's. Cheers! // FrankB 02:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hey

[edit]

Question answered... -- Nbound 04:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal Space exploration

[edit]

Well, I got confused about the 'E' or 'e' issue by looking at other portals. I believe you are correct about using the 'e', so we should consistently rename all subpages, too. The color scheme is a more personal choice. I was aiming for "NASA blue" as the color, which is much easier on the eye than stark black and white. I did not expect a consistent color between portals, actually. If they are all black, one might get lost more easily... Cheers Awolf002 11:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russia... Yes, I believe they use 'blue' as well, so I might be okay :-) Thanks for the heads up! Awolf002 18:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to let you know that you might want to add a members section to the project page above. One of the two criteria for deletion of a project is no active members listed on the project page, and right now this project page has no members section and no members. The same thing holds true for Wikipedia:WikiProject Spacecraft. Badbilltucker 19:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reshuffling Space portals

[edit]

hi; as per discussions at Portal talk:Space exploration and Portal talk:Spaceflight, i think we're going to change things a bit.. at the moment the plan seems to be to rename Space exploration to Space technology, and keep Spaceflight. Then Spaceflight would deal with anything that would have been in Space exploration (the reasoning here is that there are spaceflights (i.e. communication satellites) that have nothing to do with exploration). And Space technology would focus more on technical things, perhaps the building and design of spacecraft, and anything else used in space, spacecraft propulsion, etc.. that kind of thing. Does that seem like a reasonable split? so:

your thoughts would be welcome. the phrase Space exploration, though appealing, seems a little too ambiguous, i think. Mlm42 08:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

template vs. wikipedia namespace

[edit]

i've noticed you've been using the Template: namespace for much of the content you added to various WikiProject pages.. i think they should really be in the Wikipedia: namespace, which is where WikiProject reside, so i've been moving them there. if there is any reason why you think this is a bad idea, let me know. Mlm42 10:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on nominating Wikipedia:WikiProject Spacecraft for deletion in a week's time, as it a) seems to be inactive and b) hasn't gotten started. The content it would deal with also falls under WP:SPACE or Wikipedia:WikiProject Space exploration. Please let me know if you have any objections to this. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this portal for deletion. However, I have started a new portal at Portal:Solar System. Feel free to contribute. Atomic1609 18:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject_Space/Navigation_boxes moved

[edit]

Template:WikiProject_Space/Navigation_boxes moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Space/Astronomical navigation, just so you know the former link gives a double redirect (my clumsy paws). Rursus 20:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wabanaki redirect you've started is now a disambiguation

[edit]

Please take a look and help clean it up. Thanks. CJLippert 16:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space missions WikiProject

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you are a member of the Space missions WikiProject. A couple of weeks ago, I proposed that the Space missions and Space travellers projects, which both appear to be inactive be merged into the Human Spaceflight project. Whilst this is being done, the capitalisation of the Human spaceflight project's title would also be corrected (ie. Human SpaceflightHuman spaceflight). The projects are all doing the same/very similar things, and in my opinion, a single, larger, project would be more effective than three smaller, and somewhat inactive projects.. In light of very little response to messages on the project talk pages, I am now sending this message to all members of all three projects, inviting them to discuss the proposal on the Human Spaceflight project's talk page. I would appreciate your opinion on this. Thanks. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International Space Station

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:International Space Station#The Failed FAC. Thank you. Colds7ream (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spaceflight portals

[edit]

Hello! As an member editor of one or more of the Spaceflight, Human spaceflight, Unmanned spaceflight, Timeline of spaceflight or Space colonisation WikiProjects, I'd like to draw to your attention a proposal I have made with regards to the future of the spaceflight-related portals, which can be found at Portal talk:Spaceflight#Portal merge. I'd very much appreciate any suggestions or feedback you'd be able to offer! Many thanks,

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Human spaceflight at 08:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Human spaceflight activity

[edit]

Hello there! As part of an effort to determine how many active editors are present in the spaceflight-related WikiProjects, I have made some changes to the list of members of WikiProject Human spaceflight. If you still consider yourself to be an active editor in this project, I would be grateful if you would please edit the list so that your name is not struck out - thus a clearer idea of the critical mass of editors can be determined. Many thanks in advance!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Human spaceflight at 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Space Colonization activity

[edit]

Hello there! As part of an experiment to determine how many active editors are present in the spaceflight-related WikiProjects, some changes have been made to the list of members of WikiProject Space Colonization. If you still consider yourself to be an active editor in this project, we would be grateful if you would please edit the list so that your name is not struck out - thus a clearer idea of the critical mass of editors can be determined. Many thanks in advance.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space Colonization at 16:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hello WikiProject Space member! A discussion has been started regarding the future of WikiProject Space here; any comments you might have would be welcome! There are mainly two competing ideas:

  1. Centralize all the Space-related WikiProjects, such as Astronomy and Spaceflight, and merge them into WikiProject Space, or
  2. Separate the Astronomy and Spaceflight "sides" of WikiProject, and remove WikiProject Space.

If you can think of other options, that's great too. Your contribution to the discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space at 00:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Spaceflight reboot

[edit]

Hello there! As you may or may not be aware, a recent discussion on the future of the Space-related WikiProjects has concluded, leading to the abolition of WP:SPACE and leading to a major reorganisation of WP:SPACEFLIGHT. It would be much appreciated if you would like to participate in the various ongoing discussions at the reorganisation page and the WikiProject Spaceflight talk page. If you are a member of one of WP:SPACEFLIGHT's child projects but not WP:SPACEFLIGHT itself, it would also be very useful if you could please add your name to the member list here. Many thanks!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The Downlink: Issue 0

[edit]
 
   The Downlink   
 
    Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight Issue 0, December 2010  
 
You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 16:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The Downlink: Issue 1

[edit]
 
   The Downlink   
 
    Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight Issue 1, January 2011  
 
You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Downlink: Issue 2

[edit]
 
   The Downlink   
 
    Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight Issue 2, February 2011  
 
You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Downlink: Issue 3

[edit]
 
   The Downlink   
 
    Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight Issue 3, March 2011  
 
You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space Colonization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JJ98 (Talk) 04:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Templates has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Categories main has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Scope has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Goals has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Strategy has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Layout has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Introduction has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Categories has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Space/Articles has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 11:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]