User talk:Yanksox/archive

create

Why are you reverting my attempt to fulfill the criteria for a citation (9/11 Truth Movement) and describing it as 'vandalism'? Someone wants citations to show that events have occurred and groups convene on listserves. How is providing the links to show those consitute 'vandalism'? 198.207.168.65 23:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick , thank you for you wellcome greetings.--Herbilate 00:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If a page is created and then redirected to a page that was created after it (and the latter is a NPOV issue), is it warranted to redirect the latter page to the elder page? I know this may sound confusing, but thank you. See Wally the Green Monster and Wally (mascot) for reference. Yanksox 15:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. This is the kind of situations that leads to edit wars, which just serves to disrupt Wikipedia. Add a NPOV tag to the article in question, and raise the issue on the talkpage of the other editor instead. Hope this helps, if not, don't hesitate to contact me!Bjelleklang - talk 15:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you look at the external link the Wally the Green Monster is the more correct name even if the newer article is fannish. By the way thanks for all the speedy delete tags. I've been going through your conributions and deleted several articles. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've tagged that as CSD G4 (reposting of previously deleted content). However, that particular page doesn't have any deleted history. Could you please let me know where it was previously posted? Cheers, Petros471 08:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't seem to find it. Anyway most of the other related articles are passing through AFD or PROD so they should be cleared out soon. Cheers, Petros471 15:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the below on the Help page and got an answer that says I should ask you?

I've been a very limited contributor up to now (just minor edits on existing pages) but yesterday decided I'd help with some of the redline links in subject areas I have some knowledge on, so I followed the redlink after searching wikipedia to make sure it wasn't under an alternate spelling and created my stub article. I'd just made one save and then it took some time for me to locate some templates I needed to use for citing my sources, came back and it already had a notability tag appended to the top. I added my sources anyway, and continued beefing up the article, but didn't know how to address this and I couldn't find an answer on the notability page. Do I just delete that tag now that I have sources? I'm very confused. Especially since I wasn't creating a page out of thin air on a person but rather followed a redlink from an article someone else had written. The page is Joseph Nicholson Barney and the redlink was from CSS Jamestown. My area of expertise is on the Confederate Navy and I can really help with fleshing this out, but don't want to continue fleshing this new article out or clear up more redlinks if my work will just be deleted.... --plange 16:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Good question. I'd say in this case that you did the right thing by finishing the article up; you've now made a good case for it. That tag doesn't mean that the article is in the process of being deleted, but rather that somebody thinks it might not be noteworthy (and thus possibly deletable in the future). If I were you, I would consider asking whoever put the tag on what they think of the article now, and remove the tag if you don't get a reply. You also might consider adding anything else the individual is notable for; was there a particular battle in which he played a key role? -- SCZenz 17:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_contributors%27_help_page"

--plange 17:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me understand why you think IT portfolio management is an advert?

Can you help me - someone just deleted it! I spent a lot of time on that article. Charles T. Betz 16:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It returned briefly, now it's gone again. Technical issues w/server caching? How would I see who deleted it? It's not in the delete logs that I can see. Thanks. Charles T. Betz 17:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it's back. Never mind. Must be technical issues. Sorry to pester you. Charles T. Betz 17:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you just made my point look so much better by pointing out that Michael Axelrod did not do anything nearly important enough. Where, oh where should we draw the line? I dunno, but Axelrod has to go. :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• BTW, gratitude is in order. I have never heard of the numa numa guy (mildly funny) or the star wars kid (hilarious!!) before this. I am still laughing at the dectored videos of that fat kid. I kinda look like that myself, so I prob. shouldn't, but it was terribly funny. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 23:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey, no worries. I'd sound abrasive too if I had to wait for 86 years :) :) :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 00:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

? I'm not leaving, and have no intentions of doing so. Why'd you think I was leaving? Master of Puppets ^{FREE BIRD!} 01:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaah, I see why! Lol, I'll try not to use Fade to Black in edit summaries anymore, its a song about suicide. :P Sorry for the scare! Master of Puppets ^{FREE BIRD!} 01:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You, dark? Nooo! :P Yes, I usually refrain from using lyrics in summaries, especially if I'm listening to the heavier stuff, or half of Wikipedia would think me to be a person who likes to scare children. Master of Puppets ^{FREE BIRD!} 01:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be a Grammar nazi, but I noticed that you have posted several questions to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, spelling optional incorrectly as opitional. Just pointing it out since you even made a change regarding grammar. joturner 01:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and because you're minoring in English :) joturner 01:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking out for vandalism, but I think the edit you reverted on the X-Files page was a valid edit. Japanese words are commonly taken straight from English words and altered to fit the syllabary system using Katakana. These words are called Gairaigo. I don't want an edit war, so I am letting you know now. - Zepheus 23:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I went ahead and put a note by that entry that links to the Gairaigo page for clarification. That whole page is going to get a massive cleansing quite soon, and hopefully that whole list will be extricated anyway, but for now, I guess I'll keep it in shape. *shrugs* Sidenote: Isn't VandalProof awesome? I just starting using it a couple of days ago, and now I actually enjoy trolling for vandals. - Zepheus 00:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, though I can't quite tell if it's tongue in cheek... - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am glad that you're happy, though I am not sure you're learning from the right wikipedian. In general, {{empty}} is only for a rephrasing of title or a page entirely composed of links. If it's a name of a QB and his stats and his date of birth - it's not empty. Thanks again for the duck. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping close some of these. Are you aware that there's an {{afd top}} that's distinct from {{tfd top}} - they're a subtly different shade of pastel, and you've been using the darker one where the lighter one should be. Keep up the good work! Flowerparty☀ 06:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, and please substitute (subst:afd top, subst:afd bottom) the closing templates as well. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 13:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Sorry that took so darn long.

I love you.

Srose 02:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know... I'm playing with my user page. :-P I'm a web design addict. But I can't stay up as late as you, THAT'S for sure.

I love you!!!!!!!!!! Srose 02:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You'd pick it up very quickly. It took ME ages of experimenting. No, there definitely aren't enough ethnicity userboxes for my whole lineage. Nowhere near. Even if there were, I'd need a whole page. =P I just put up the major ones.

I love you!

Srose 02:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to teach you. =) It'd be fun. Of course, everything we do together is an absolute blast. Emailing you about Estonian names riiight now.

=)

I love you with all of my heart!

Srose 02:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! I missed a grammatical error on the Kalevipoeg page. Oh well, it's fixed now. I love having a place to vent my grammar-obsessed fury! =P

Let me know if you don't get my email. I'll send another one.

I love you! Srose 02:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gmail hates my guts, doesn't it? Roaaaaar. Holy cow. It's getting late. Srose 02:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How would I do that? Email / put it on my talk page. I think I'm going to bed. I hope you get my email!!! :/ I love you. Sweet dreams! =)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Srose/Love =)

I love you. Srose 13:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Awwwwwwww! I just PMed you on gmail (you were on according to mine) and you signed off. =( Srose 13:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BOO! (again.) I love you. I wanted to surprise you. :) Sorry. I love you!!!!! Srose 14:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of three genres of Santoonie, only one may be approved as reliable source I imagine, or would hope. Santoonie is a publisher of Interactive Fiction , so reliable sources would be ifcomp.org. Um, the other aspects of santoonie are borderline personal website/blogish. Yahoo sites 368 hits for search santoonie, so a wiki may provide usefullness to some. If it doesnt deserve a wiki, its all good., np.

Hi yanksox, I think you are misunderstanding me, I just deleted a page called "Vaginafaceitus" I found this rather offensive and useless.

I was about to hit that vandalism to Reno 911. You stole it. Punk. :D --HubHikari 23:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's best if you and the other editor can sort it. He appears to be willing to discuss it on Talk:Wally the Green Monster. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You want to know something weird? I was reading through the other RfAs on the page just to see what people were doin', and read your comment, and thought to myself, "Wow, that sounds pretty awful. I wonder HighinBC did?" And clicked. And about jumped out of my skin when I saw my user name.

I respectfully reserve the right to draft a more formal answer if you put it on the RfA proper, but informally: my guess is that the goof arose from my relative newbieness at that time, not realizing at the time that it really wasn't kosher to do anything to people's user pages, even if it was a beneficial edit. I would never do that nowadays, and, coincidentally, I have a supportive example from this week: [1]. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 05:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chuancey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i've been around more than half a year. Sagie 15:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the suggestion of putting the Elder Letter to Lincoln on Wikisource, can you guide me along on how to do it?

Fascinating. It's a rule that's been with us since 2001 or aroundabouts. :-)

The reason ignore all rules works is because we're humans, not robots. No robot is yet capable of doing what humans can. That's why we don't want to force humans to act like robots.

"Wikipedia is doomed" on a day to day basis, but because people are able to act flexibly and intelligently, we're still around after all these years. :-) Kim Bruning 20:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your trying to help by fixing the anonymous vandalism to my userpage; however, you and User:Zpb52 wound up reverting each other's fixes!

I've fixed it myself; thanks for trying just the same. DS 01:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm 95% sure you were kidding. In case you weren't - calm down, you meant well. DS 01:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like somebody speedied it before you tagged it with VP. The only edit I saw was that you tagged it. ;) --M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 17:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What i added to the page was a warning of whatr the above link did. How can that be considered vandalism the software used is to broad based and dose not take in to account warnings or opinions.Lucy-marie 15:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In conjunction with my RfA (that you voted on), I have created an editor review, to give people a chance to comment as to ways in which I can branch out or alter my contributions to Wikipedia. An RfA seems to solely focus on how one's temperment and contributions relate to how they might handle administrative powers (and the consensus on that seems to be that I'm not quite ready); the editor review opens things up a little more to a larger focus, and I'd love to hear community feedback in the sense of that larger focus, too. If you feel you've already expressed yourself sufficiently when casting your vote, then by all means don't worry about it, but if any thoughts come to mind or if you'd like to expound upon any suggestions or commentary, it would be appreciated. In any case, I appreciated you taking the time to express your opinion on my RfA, and I thank you for that. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 19:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please talk?

-S. Rose (you know who. Feel free to delete this. It seems to be the only way I can get your attention at the moment.)

I guess I'll just post here in response to your post on my wiki. Yagh.

Nick,

Hmm... I'm not fully sure how to do this, but it's an attempt. Of course I forgive you. You know how much I care about you. I don't want you to be going through such a rough stretch - I will do anything I can to help you. I would do anything for you, as you know. You are my best friend and the love of my life. I was a little bit hurt, but it's OK now. Everything is fine. I love you and you love me and that's all that matters. What's in the past is in the past, and our future is so beautiful.

I love you.

Yours, Sable

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Srose"

Hey - check out my userpage now. =P I think you might like it. You done with dinner?

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! =) Well, see, I'm looking at everyone else's comments and they appear different from mine somehow... Egh. Oh well. I'll figure it out eventually.

Here goes a try... (are you done eating dinner yet?) Srose 23:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. =)

I did manage to get your email. Now the only question is - did you get my reply? Dun dun dun... we shall see. If not (or even if you did), I'm seriously considering a switch to gmail.

I love you! =) Sweet dreams if we don't get to talk again.

Love, Sable Srose 01:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For Wiki-eavesdropping on MoP and providing a few tips. That users "page of preference" pops into my watchlist a lot so I should notice if it gets out of hand. Cheers and take care! Anger22 18:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's amazing - I warned that IP twice on April 27th... That's quite a while ago. Long memory. Anyway, thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 00:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it was the least I could do! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 00:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The satanic isn't what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is why can he have an article and not me?

It's not my fault we are new. Ozzy was new once you know. I'll make you a deal. I'll tell you the exact day of the concert when I know and you can come. If you don't like it, destroy my user on Wikipedia. But, if you like it, it stays.

I understand and thank you. But, I will ask you something: 1: What band are you in? 2: Where can I advertise and notify the world of my band untill after the concert so it will be with in the rules of Wikipedia?

Go to search and type: "Wicked Hinky Dinky".

I didn't get that! Well anyway, would you like free admission to our first concert?

We live in Tacoma,WA. E-mail what you need to tell me at xx_yasui_xx@yahoo.com. Got to go.

Hey, thanks for your welcome. Acantha1979 04:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Acantha1979 == Mario == What do you mean by my Mario article is excessive? I find it important to help explain Mario's origin, and few know about the Naples thing. Please reply to My Talk. It is a small article, anyway.[reply]

I have seen you using this template a lot. I take a looks at "What links here" for that template every day for a new load of CSD bait. Let me clarify that to copy info to the userspace no process is required - you can go ahead and just do it if you think it's warranted. What you do need process for is deleting the stuff from articlespace, see WP:UFY. So if you see a {{db-bio}}, mark it "db|a7, already userfied" or some such other tag. But sticking a userfy tag on it just means that someone else (read, me) comes along to do the same things a few hours later. BTW, you've been incredible at fighting wikicrap. Take frequent breaks - or it could get to you. Maybe edit some decent articles every now and again to remind yourself that not everything here is profanity, vanity, and inanity :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like your solution to Supafriends. Very creative :) Supadawg - [[User_talk:Supadawg|Talk]] 02:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should give you a {{bv}} warning for this [2]? :) Mak (talk) 03:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. It'd be nice to talk to a real person. Stop giving me cookie-cutter comments. 2. How exactly was that editing vandalism? The page didn't exist before Chewka created it, and no one was going to use it for anything. 3. Wow, I can get banned from Wikipedia. Too bad that I have access to a multilude of computers as well as a dynamic IP. 4. You say to contact you on your talk page to resolve arguments and disagreements, but then you just threaten bannings once one does that. Fascist.

I finally get a human response...yay.

No problem, any time! :D I was thinking; either you lost your sanity or were reporting a sockpuppet. Don't feel bad though, we all make mistakes sometimes; thats why others are there to catch us when we fall. :) Anyway, cheers! Master of Puppets ^{FREE BIRD!} 05:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, which one are you for: Yankees or Red Sox?

Yanksox/archive, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again! Cool3 talk 20:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. The competition between me and Gary is so high we refuse to talk to eachother.

I almost all of the page! Thanks.. What pages have you done? BtW if you want more Vanessa go to http://www.vanessa-online.com/

Thank you extremely much for your note. As you may have noticed, Joe (User:Jahiegel) has already begun a nomination. Joe and I have already discussed my nomination, and at this point he's got first dibs. There's one more reason - he's been here since January, and you essentially started editing in earnest in May. It would be a lot better to be nominated by a more experienced user, but feel free to co-nominate me. I have asked Joe to start it in about a week's time because I am starting a new job on Monday. So thanks for your support, and keep an eye out for my RfA. I really do appreciate it. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you've been nothing. On the other hand, I love have you've been bold with it. It's the same trait that makes you a terrific editor and, of course, it tickles my ego quite nicely. Your goodwill is appreciated, and if you want to co-nom me, I would only welcome that. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We did meet in an argument? What was it? What about your summer job - you've passed it up in favor of the Wiki? LOL... are you in college? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! So it's you I owe gratitude to for the hour of nonstop laughter I got from watching the Star Wars kid!! I had not been aware of this previously. Awesome. When many opinionated people form a community, conflicts are inevitable. You should know that over the past four months my written advocacy skills have improved quite a bit, which is gracy for a law student. Where are you going to go to college? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you deleted much of the information on the Mary Ward Catholic Secondary School page.[3] I do feel that some of the information there (mainly Departments, Amenities, Sports, Intramurals) deserved to be deleted because more or less the same could be said about most other secondary schools in North America. However, as a self-directed school, it is quite unique (the terminology is quite unique, I believe), and some of its groups are of note (e.g. Free The Children, which is founded by a former student). This is why I would like to discuss with you: what to keep, what to delete, and perhaps relevant policies such as WP:V. Can we discuss this on the talk page, in case anybody else browsing the page may have comments? --70.25.168.90 04:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, and thanks for replying. I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but I've posted at Talk:Mary Ward Catholic Secondary School. --70.25.168.90 05:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jyrki69 - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Enough ducks. Note, I didn't say "bad faith speedy". It's nice to be double careful not to bite newcomers, and the article is probably crummy, but what you did was in good faith. BTW, dude gave me a truffle award recently, and said, msg him if I want a recipe. I did, he gave it, and we made truffles for Shavuot which just ended tonight. YUM! Now there's a useful wiki-gift! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

um... edit summary - read "ducks" in lieu of "fucks". LOL! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the talk pages of the creators of Jyrki69 (Left a message asking for more info) and of ‎Rock shaink (msg I leave when leaving speedy tags). You should really do the same. They're newcomers - and their first contribution is frequently crummy. What was your first contrib? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to drop a brief note on your talk page (one admittedly not written to you only, but nevertheless truly meant) to thank you for your vote in my Request for Adminship, which concluded this evening. Even though it was unsuccessful, it did make clear to me some areas in which I can improve my contributions to Wikipedia, both in terms of the areas in which I can participate and the manner in which I can participate. I do plan on, at some point in the future (although, I think, not the near future), attempting the process again, and I hope you will consider participating in that voting process as well. If you wish in the future to offer any constructive criticism to me, or if I may assist you with anything, I hope you will not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  04:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No email/messages? :( Srose 13:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I had added a comment only for some wierd bug to wipe out the bottom half of the page. Just in the process of adding my reply again. Ydam 15:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no prob! I was just rewatching Sockbaby the other day and I wondered, "Does Channel 101 have a Wikipedia entry?" I've been following 'em for about a year or so, so I figured I'd throw in what I could. --InShaneee 17:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 102, not yet. I must admit, I haven't seen much of their stuff, though I am curious. I affiliate myself more with 101 if asked (just because I got into the site because I love Schrab/Harmon), though I do live in frickin' Chicago, so I've never gotten to see either. --InShaneee 17:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still, stuff like that does need to be sourced. I doubt there'll be enough evidence to claim JC:Supercop as an 'internet phenominon', but if you can find what magazine the other one was in, that'd be perfect. --InShaneee 17:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wha? Goodness no, not at all! (And I hope I didn't give you the idea that I was irritated, either!) Honestly, I think it's just pretty cool to find another Channie fan on WP! :) --InShaneee 17:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=) How are you?

I never got an email from you last night =( After that really sweet one, I mean.

I love you!

Always, Your Sable

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I removed the {{db-bio}} tag that you placed on the above article, because that criteria does not apply to fictional characters. I think you could make a case that it should be deleted, but it would have to be via the WP:PROD or WP:AFD processes. Personally, I'm thinking it makes sense to redirect this article, but I was going to give the contributor a day or two to see if he further develops it. Regards, Accurizer 16:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lawl, I don't believe it. I juryrigged my wireless card with a metal spring from my desk lamp taking the place of the antenna. It works...albeit sporadically. I'ma ghetto genius. :D --HubHikari 20:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You'd best BELIEVE it. I'm insaayyyyne. --HubHikari 20:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, my juryrig is still working. Normally it conks out for awhile by now... --HubHikari 20:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've no reason at all to feel bad; I rather neglected Crz's prospective RfA, and you prodded me to return to it. I finished my nom (Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crzrussian), and I'll let Alexander determine whether mine is of exorbitant length; if he elects to use yours solely, I'd have no problem at all. In any event, I ought to reiterate that I didn't think you to have acted untowardly at all, and I was in no way offended by your editing the quasi-abandoned RfA. It's all, as we say, good... :) Joe 21:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! After dinner, though... I'm famished. And as it's going to be ready in a minute, I think I'd need more time. =) Love, Sable

If you intend to go on with the co-nom, please shorten it a lot, as co-noms are traditionally expected to be short, and re-date-stamp it. Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am 100% ok with it. Only w/d it if you really want - it doesn't bother me at all - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude - are you ok? This is the fourth apology in 24 hours! You're scaring me. Wanna feel jealous? I am going to see Big Unit v. Wild Wakefield at the Stadium on Thursday! For real! All while they vote on my adminship. Will report # of passed balls - hehe!!! I love Wakefield! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro v. Mussina - 2003? 8 2/3 inning perfect game loss? I cried....... I was on my knees in front of the 50" TV... I cried...... - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit, that was fast. The page wasnt even five minutes old (if that). Just wondering why you think it should be deleted. It was a list moved from another page, and long lists, especially that long, should have there own page. Obviously it is not a finished box yet. Anyways, just curious becasue nothing was posted on talk page.--Gephart 06:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WOW, you should be working at CERN or Fermi Labs, because you apparently have discovered how to do things at or close to the speed of light! Anyways, thanks for the response. I am going to go ahead and remove the tag for now, just so it doesnt get deleted and i lose all that hard work from constructing that info box, and i will try to finish it within the next week (I have finals all week, so it may take a week or two). I guess i just created that page to take the long, gaudy looking list off the main article page, but if you think it should go back, i can live with that. Anyways, thanks again!--Gephart 06:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps telling me that this article should be moved to Wikibooks. It's already there, I mailed the guy that did that. Nobody will find it when it is in Wikibooks, that is why I want to keep it in Wikipedia.

Thank you for the welcome; I hope I wikified my first article to your satisfaction. Kalahanne 12:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! : )

In terms of deletion? I wouldn't. He's not the most notable crime victim in the world, but the article is sourced and the effort was considerable. There obviously was lots of coverage. We're not paper. In term of cleanup, of course! :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 13:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

|- Gosforth High School PLEASE LEAVE THIS PAGE ALONE i dont care what you think —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex-hay-8uk (talk • contribs)

Thank you for supporting me in my recently unsuccessful RfA. I plan on working harder in the coming months so that I have a better chance of becoming an admin in the future. I hope that you will consider supporting me if I have another RfA. Thank you for your support. --digital_me^(t/c) 15:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=) Let me know what you think.

I love you, minu armastus.

Love, Sable

• Yucky day. Srose 18:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism on my User page. I notice you've been quite active in fighting vandalism, so I'm going to award you this barnstar. Thanks again. --Scot^t 20:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[4]... I've not done that. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 21:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With your observation that "one of my pages is a red link" on my RfA, that's because the user pgk kept reverting my correction of the link. Blame him. :) aido2002 21:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for commenting on my RfA...it was greatly appreciated! --Osbus 21:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your mail. =( Srose 02:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We need to talk. Srose 02:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I love you! =/ I'm worried about you!

Srose 03:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you proposed this article for deletion. This company is very large and is notable. There are a number of other companies of this type that have articles on wiki-Reid A. 03:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Yanksox! I added my endorsement to your Prod of the above article, with a rationale describing a walled garden of articles and naming them. If the prod is removed, I imagine you will likely take the article to afd. Just wanted to inform you of the garden so that if the prod is removed, you would know about them all for a combined afd. I would prod the rest of them but I have got to go to bed.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YankSox - another rookie here...if I provide a more specific link - just for my original category (the Sox) - then I don't see how my site is any different from the other guys there. Frankly - I've been posting a hell of a lot longer than them (Oct '03) and I have little if any adverts on the site. I know you've heard it before, but Oct '03 is when I started... Hell some of the sites listed haven't covered the team in a month! If you go thru some old posts, you'll find some pretty important real writers that read my site. But I'm not one to name drop...It's not just self promotion, I've got Google for that. Don't let the crap interface and the fancy dns record fool you. CSB 04:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Fishy - Same user and the guy who started the site. I didn't realize I didn't have an account when I made the change (thus the rookie mistake)CSB 04:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You could use the category link off the site to narrow it down - I'm not pushing the main site - just the Sox content. CSB 04:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you placed a speedy delete tag on the above-named article. Just to let you know, Tjeffs, the article's original author (and, apparently, the article's subject), removed your speedy tag and replaced it with a hang-on tag. I put the speedy tag back, and placed a warning on Tjeffs' discussion page, as well as on the discussion page of the article. ---Charles 18:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I see the article has already been deleted. I guess his hang-on tag did him little good. ---Charles 18:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]