Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1530s in architecture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. android79 01:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Only one Event happened in that Decade and I merged the info already to Architecture timeline 1530s with nothing else to do here Delete --Aranda56 01:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC) Keep per expansion good job resucuing the article from deletion the other decades need info though . --Aranda56 22:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteIf there are other things that happened in that decade of note, we can keep it. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 03:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Keep with additions. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 16:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. When I saw this, my reaction was that more than one notable thing relating to architecture had to have occurred in that decade. I've added a few, I'm sure others will add more. (The 1520's could use more entries as well.) Crypticfirefly 04:01, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. With the addition of a few more events, the article already becomes larger than many other "Decade in architecture" articles. -Nameneko 05:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. I am sure that more could be added especially as the Renaissance was well underway during the period. Capitalistroadster 05:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge to a slightly longer time frame --TimPope 21:22, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep , with recent expansions, and potential for future expansions. Also becase this article has a place in the larger context of "Decade in architecture" articles -- LiniShu 04:07, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep must be plenty of potential for more expansion. CalJW 09:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.