Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Shapiro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 05:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Shapiro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a disambiguation that doesn't actually lead to any articles.

Neither of the people here appear to be notable and neither of them appear to have any significant level of coverage. Transcendence (talk) 05:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Television, Internet, and Disambiguations. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I just listed this as a candidate for speedy deletion G14 (no extant pages). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and Florida. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: someone has done the work to distinguish these two people (easily confused: American media types), each of whom might have reasonably had a redirect pointing to the article where they are mentioned, and the dab page not only does the work of both those redirects but helps avoid future editors incorrectly conflating the two into one person. Not eligible for CSD under my reading of the very tight criteria of G14. PamD 10:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that in each case they aren't just mentioned as existing as a sister, but have article content: the one was trolled as being Ben's sister, the other has recorded as the Shapiro Sisters. So each certainly would merit a redirect if the other didn't exist: as they both do exist, we need a dab page. PamD 10:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per PamD. MB 13:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per PamD and MOS:DABMENTION. feminist (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per PamD. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 18:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we do not need disambiguation for non-articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • We do though. Yes, we do. – Uanfala (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per PamD. I think it's beneficial to have it. Zeddedm (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Utterly pointless, even when there are actual articles for people it is discouraged to have a disambiguation for only two items.★Trekker (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not the case. Unless one of the two topics is primary, then the base title must be disambiguated: WP:TWODABS. – Uanfala (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per PamD: both topics pass the threshold of meaningful content at which we start to provide navigation via redirects or dab pages. No argument has been made that there is a primary topic. – Uanfala (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.