Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actrius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actrius[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability -- Rotten tomatoes shows zero reviews [1] NE Ent 23:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There are reviews, just nothing reliable in English.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: Actually there are some English language sourcing added, but notability is not dependent on sources having to be in English. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The current references are IMDB and a dead link and I'm personally unable to use Spanish references -- if someone can find / add one I'll be happy to withdraw the nom. NE Ent 00:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NE Ent: dead link corrected and sources now added. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This appears to quote two reviews, one from The Guardian and one from Evening Standard. There's also this (albeit brief) review here. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as now corrected and sourced to show a notability to Catalan cinema. Certainly more can (and should) be done, but no need now to delete. NE Ent? CNMall41? Erik? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - seems to be sufficient for sourcing and international screenings, considering that Catalan cinema is probably not a major industry. Dl2000 (talk) 04:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.