Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Henley
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alice Henley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not have multiple significant acting roles to satisfy WP:NACTOR, which means she has no WP:SIGCOV. – DarkGlow • 10:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 10:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 10:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 10:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Article is entirely unreferenced, sources in RS don't exist (to my mild surprise). Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: This is an established actress who has been acting for many years. We should, of course, improve/add more references. --Thorwald (talk) 00:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment and where might said sources be? – DarkGlow • 14:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no sourcing at all. Just being paid to be an actress does not make someone notable. We have specific notability criteria and they are not met.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.