Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquapac
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aquapac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. and is promotional material for Aquapac International Limited, (which is also not notable) SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 27. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Nom. 2006 unsourced article that fails WP:ORGCRIT This is a small company with around $5 Million revenue. One source lists 11 employees and another 41 employees. At any rate, Wikipedia is not a business directory. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Note: the nominator is a sockpuppet who has been blocked indefinitely. Please vote regardless. Nythar (💬-🎃) 00:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources and it is promotional. The only thing I could find when I searched it up was the product from the company on amazon and other shopping companies.`~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 02:59, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete can't find anything that suggests notability. --Devokewater 11:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.