Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are you Still Awake? (Radio Show) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you Still Awake? (Radio Show)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Are you Still Awake? (Radio Show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This short-lived radio show seems to fail WP:N; no substantial independent sources abut it have been found, the link given is just a list of episodes. Note: The article has survived a mass nomination last year, which was closed for procedural reasons. The article has not been changed since then. I'm relisting it individually now. B. Wolterding (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no independent reliable source to establish notability of this program. It probably isn't.--Boffob (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. To repeat some of my points in the previous AFD, series aired by a national network, regardless of length, are inherently notable. This is a BBC Radio series. That alone establishes notability. 23skidoo (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Forgive my skepticism, but which notability guidelines says such things as nationally aired series are inherently notable?--Boffob (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I said in the first case. A radio show that ran for one month, no evidence of notability. We're not a directory of every BBC radio program. See also, this AfD for other similarly short-lived programs. Simply airing on the BBC is not inherent notability. StarM 02:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.