Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babou Barro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —fetch ·comms 01:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Babou Barro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by the football agent. He add some fake and unsourced information which I removed. It seems that there are no signs of notability about this player Wrwr1 (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - appears notable, as he was the topscorer in the 2007 UMEOA tournament (albeit for a B national side) and has drawn attention from French clubs. There are a few articles in French about his exploits so even if he fails NPSORTS, he may pass GNG. Jogurney (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Add some more sources and I'll re-consider. Giant Snowman 11:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unless more sources are added. Argyle 4 Life^talk 19:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As per WP:AGF, i agree that this article should be kept. The subject appears to be notable being a top scorer in the respective league. --Gian (talk) 03:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails the general notability guideline and the sub-guideline NSPORT. Big Dom 07:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, he fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, sort of failing WP:ATHLETE, and definitely failing WP:GNG. Nolelover 01:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.