Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Simon (Georgia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 18:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Simon (Georgia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Simply being the editor of an on-line publication does not make one notable. There's far from enough criteria here to pass muster. Capnpen 17:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. --KFP (talk | contribs) 16:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - no sources cited, so no evidence of multiple coverage in independent sources to show notability per WP:BIO. Delete unless appropriate sources are added. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 17:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, if adequate sources and references are added by end of this AfD change to Keep Alf^Photoman 19:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep, Atlanta Journal seems to be non-trivial enough for me, probably other sources can be found Alf^Photoman 01:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep Found one good ref.--but, being a blogger, he is mainly referred to in other blogs.DGG 00:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete After searching for sources on this subject, I am certain of one thing: Bill Simon is a popular name. That being said, I failed to find multiple, independent sources of which this Bill Simon is the subject. He is quoted in a few stories and the source linked to by the article discusses him as one among several bloggers. This does not meet the notability requirements, however. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 01:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One quote and a brief paragraph in one newspaper is not notability. If it is, we'll have to expand Wikipedia considerably. Puppetress 18:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.