Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaine Trump (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Family of Donald Trump#Robert Trump. The consensus was to delete, but I don't see any good reason not to recreate as a redirect, as suggested by Redditaddict69. – Joe (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blaine Trump (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No new coverage emerged since the previous AfD one year ago. Her ex-husband's article was deleted. Her own notability per RS hinges only on a New York Times socialite puff piece from 1987. Her role as vice-chair on a charity's board is only sourced to that charity's web page, which does not even have a mini-bio of this person. Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED, especially not-inherited twice-removed. — JFG ^talk 17:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 17:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I'm seeing multiple reliable sources: NY Times, People. Two reliable sources = passing WP:GNG, even if just barely. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete:I agree that this page should be deleted. I don't think this person, although one time married to a relative of a person of notoriety, is reason enough for a page, esp when there is limited information available about the person. There just isn't anything that meets WP:SUSTAINED with this person to merit a page. P37307 (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete human interest coverage in a puff piece does not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom, this article hasn't improved WP:GNG wise since the last AFD and as mentioned above she fails WP:SUSTAINED .Blaine's mention in the 'Family of Donald Trump' article is suffice. JC7V-constructive zone 03:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I don't think it is required to justify or dispute the old sources or whether they are enough to justify a page. There just isn't anything that meets WP:SUSTAINED with this person to merit a page. She hasn't made news and just because her ex-husband is related to someone isn't enough for a page. No offense to the relister, but this relisting needs to be disputed and the page deleted as a consensus has been met.. P37307 (talk) 20:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The New York Times is an outstanding source for many things but it is also the local promotional newspaper for Manhattan society life, and this type of gushing "high society" coverage is not sufficient, in my opinion, to establish notabilty. As for the People source, it says "These days, Trump, 41, conforms to the standards of New York City society", and that pretty much summarizes the whole thing. People who have a lot of money and like to attend charity balls are not notable for those reasons alone, even if their wealth and attendance at gatherings of the rich can be verified. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Family of Donald Trump#Robert Trump per WP:CHEAP, WP:ATD and nomination. A merge to an entire new section on that page may be sufficient as well. Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.