Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C++ logical operators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikibook C++ Programming has a page on the topic of: Logical Operators

C++ logical operators[edit]

C++ logical operators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Orphaned article, pretty much just a tutorial. See WP:NOTGUIDE. All information here is given in the main C++ article. – Jerry^teps 04:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat (talk) 06:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, tutorials are not encyclopædic. As above, all information is already held elsewhere, so there will be no loss by deleting this (although perhaps one of our sister projects might possibly find this useful). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Transwiki to WikiVersity or WikiBooks, where tutorials can exist. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikibooks already has several books on C++, the chapters on logical operators of which are far better than this. It has no wish to be Wikipedia's dumping ground in this matter. Uncle G (talk) 15:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Wikipedia is not a how-to/guide, especially when this is already covered much better in Wikibooks. MuZemike (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• We should soft redirect to Wikibooks:C++ Programming/Operators/Logical Operators, where this subject belongs. I don't care if the current article is deleted first - if anyone has any objections to my creation of a soft redirect after deletion, please let me know. --Explodicle (T/C) 17:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No context, inaccurate on several points and otherwise incoherent. WillOakland (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTMANUAL abf /talk to me/ 11:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.